School of Psychology, Flinders University, Bedford Park, South Australia, Australia.
Institute of Positive Psychology and Education, Australian Catholic University, Strathfield, New South Wales, Australia.
Behav Res Ther. 2016 Jun;81:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2016.03.002. Epub 2016 Mar 21.
Anxiety, depression and eating disorders show peak emergence during adolescence and share common risk factors. School-based prevention programs provide a unique opportunity to access a broad spectrum of the population during a key developmental window, but to date, no program targets all three conditions concurrently. Mindfulness has shown promising early results across each of these psychopathologies in a small number of controlled trials in schools, and therefore this study investigated its use in a randomised controlled design targeting anxiety, depression and eating disorder risk factors together for the first time. Students (M age 13.63; SD = .43) from a broad band of socioeconomic demographics received the eight lesson, once weekly.b ("Dot be") mindfulness in schools curriculum (N = 132) or normal lessons (N = 176). Anxiety, depression, weight/shape concerns and wellbeing were the primary outcome factors. Although acceptability measures were high, no significant improvements were found on any outcome at post-intervention or 3-month follow-up. Adjusted mean differences between groups at post-intervention were .03 (95% CI: -.06 to -.11) for depression, .01 (-.07 to -.09) for anxiety, .02 (-.05 to -.08) for weight/shape concerns, and .06 (-.08 to -.21) for wellbeing. Anxiety was higher in the mindfulness than the control group at follow-up for males, and those of both genders with low baseline levels of weight/shape concerns or depression. Factors that may be important to address for effective dissemination of mindfulness-based interventions in schools are discussed. Further research is required to identify active ingredients and optimal dose in mindfulness-based interventions in school settings.
焦虑、抑郁和饮食失调在青少年时期达到高峰,并且具有共同的风险因素。基于学校的预防计划为在关键发展窗口期接触广泛的人群提供了独特的机会,但迄今为止,还没有一个计划同时针对这三种情况。在少数针对学校的对照试验中,正念在这三种精神病理学中都显示出了有希望的早期结果,因此本研究首次调查了其在针对焦虑、抑郁和饮食障碍风险因素的随机对照设计中的应用。来自广泛社会经济背景的学生(M 年龄 13.63;SD=.43)每周接受一次八节课的正念在学校课程(N=132)或正常课程(N=176)。焦虑、抑郁、体重/体型问题和幸福感是主要的结果因素。尽管可接受性测量很高,但在干预后或 3 个月随访时,任何结果都没有发现显著改善。干预后组间调整后的平均差异为:抑郁为.03(95% CI:-.06 至 -.11),焦虑为.01(-.07 至 -.09),体重/体型问题为.02(-.05 至 -.08),幸福感为.06(-.08 至 -.21)。在随访时,男性和两种性别的男性中,正念组的焦虑程度高于对照组,而那些基线体重/体型问题或抑郁程度较低的人也是如此。讨论了可能对在学校中有效传播基于正念的干预措施很重要的因素。需要进一步的研究来确定基于正念的干预措施在学校环境中的有效成分和最佳剂量。