• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Addressing uncertainty: what is the role of consensus in end-of-life care?

作者信息

Long Ann C, Spronk Peter E, Sprung Charles L

机构信息

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Harborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 Ninth Avenue, Box 359762, Seattle, WA, 98104, USA.

Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn Location, Apeldoorn, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jun;42(6):1043-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4336-1. Epub 2016 Apr 7.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-016-4336-1
PMID:27056552
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
Addressing uncertainty: what is the role of consensus in end-of-life care?应对不确定性：共识在临终关怀中扮演着怎样的角色？
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jun;42(6):1043-4. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4336-1. Epub 2016 Apr 7.
2
Initiating end-of-life care pathways: a discussion paper.启动终末关怀路径：讨论文件。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Oct;68(10):2359-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05924.x. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
3
Prognosis terminal: truth-telling in the context of end-of-life care.终末期预后：临终关怀背景下的告知真相
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 2014 Apr;23(2):209-19. doi: 10.1017/S0963180113000741.
4
Liminality in Pediatric Palliative Care.儿科姑息治疗中的阈限状态。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2017 May;34(4):297-300. doi: 10.1177/1049909116629758. Epub 2016 Feb 9.
5
[Ethical uncertainty about the end of life. The is no obligation to live].[关于生命终结的伦理不确定性。没有生存的义务]
Pflege Z. 2011 Sep;64(9):524-7.
6
The troubles of telling: managing communication about the end of life.告知的难题：管理关于生命终结的沟通
Qual Health Res. 2014 Feb;24(2):151-62. doi: 10.1177/1049732313519709. Epub 2014 Jan 27.
7
Palliative and end-of-life care for patients with severe COPD.重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的姑息治疗与临终关怀
Eur Respir J. 2008 Sep;32(3):796-803. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00126107. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
8
Seeking worldwide professional consensus on the principles of end-of-life care for the critically ill. The Consensus for Worldwide End-of-Life Practice for Patients in Intensive Care Units (WELPICUS) study.寻求全球范围内对危重病患者临终关怀原则的专业共识。重症监护病房患者全球临终实践共识研究（WELPICUS）。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Oct 15;190(8):855-66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201403-0593CC.
9
Overview of the domains of variables relevant to end-of-life care.与临终关怀相关的变量领域概述。
J Palliat Med. 2005;8 Suppl 1:S22-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2005.8.s-22.
10
Patient participation in palliative care decisions: An ethnographic discourse analysis.患者参与姑息治疗决策：一项人种志话语分析
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2016 Nov 22;11:32438. doi: 10.3402/qhw.v11.32438. eCollection 2016.

引用本文的文献

1
Team-family conflicts over end-of-life decisions in ICU: A survey of French physicians' beliefs.ICU 中关于生命终期决策的医患家庭冲突：对法国医生信念的调查。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 25;18(4):e0284756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284756. eCollection 2023.
2
Neurocritical care physicians' doubt about whether to withdraw life-sustaining treatment the first days after devastating brain injury: an interview study.神经危重症医师对是否在毁灭性脑损伤后最初几天停止生命支持治疗的疑虑：一项访谈研究。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Aug 28;27(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0648-9.
3
Treatment-limiting decisions in patients with severe traumatic brain injury in a Norwegian regional trauma center.

本文引用的文献

1
Guidelines for the withdrawal of life-sustaining measures.生命维持措施退出指南。
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Jun;42(6):1003-17. doi: 10.1007/s00134-016-4330-7. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
2
Global variability in withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in the intensive care unit: a systematic review.全球重症监护病房中生命维持治疗的 withholding 和 withdrawal 的变异性：一项系统评价。
Intensive Care Med. 2015 Sep;41(9):1572-85. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3810-5. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
3
Seeking worldwide professional consensus on the principles of end-of-life care for the critically ill. The Consensus for Worldwide End-of-Life Practice for Patients in Intensive Care Units (WELPICUS) study.
严重创伤性脑损伤患者在挪威区域性创伤中心的治疗限制决策。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Apr 26;25(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0385-x.
寻求全球范围内对危重病患者临终关怀原则的专业共识。重症监护病房患者全球临终实践共识研究（WELPICUS）。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Oct 15;190(8):855-66. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201403-0593CC.
4
The Durban World Congress Ethics Round Table Conference Report: III. Withdrawing Mechanical ventilation--the approach should be individualized.德班世界大会伦理圆桌会议报告：三、撤机——应采取个体化方法。
J Crit Care. 2014 Dec;29(6):902-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.05.022. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
5
The luck of the draw: physician-related variability in end-of-life decision-making in intensive care.抽签的运气：重症监护中与医生相关的生命终末期决策的可变性。
Intensive Care Med. 2013 Jun;39(6):1128-32. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-2871-6. Epub 2013 Feb 22.
6
Are religion and religiosity important to end-of-life decisions and patient autonomy in the ICU? The Ethicatt study.宗教和宗教信仰对 ICU 临终决策和患者自主性重要吗？Ethicatt 研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2012 Jul;38(7):1126-33. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2554-8. Epub 2012 Apr 14.
7
Physicians' influence over decisions to forego life support.医生对放弃生命支持决策的影响。
J Palliat Med. 2007 Dec;10(6):1298-305. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0061.
8
The importance of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units.宗教信仰和文化对欧洲重症监护病房临终决策的重要性。
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Oct;33(10):1732-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0693-0. Epub 2007 Jun 1.