Guglieri-López Beatriz, Pérez-Pitarch Alejandro, Porta Oltra Begoña, Ferriols-Lisart Francisco, Royo-Peiró Ángeles, Climente-Martí Mónica
Departments of aPharmacy bMedical Oncology, Dr Peset University Hospital of Valencia cDepartment of Pharmacy, University Clinical Hospital of Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Anticancer Drugs. 2016 Aug;27(7):679-84. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000368.
To evaluate the effectiveness and toxicity profile of ipilimumab treatment and to examine the cost-effectiveness relation in a real-world sample of patients with metastasic melanoma. This was a multicenter, observational, retrospective cohorts study. To assess the effectiveness and safety of ipilimumab treatment progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events were registered. An economic evaluation was performed and cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) were calculated. Eleven patients were included, mean age 59 (SD=11) years. The median PFS was 3.83 months (95% confidence interval 0.98-9.80) and the median OS was 5.15 months (95% confidence interval 1.70-8.48). None of the patients included in the study achieved an objective response. A stable disease was achieved in four (36%) patients. The most commonly reported analytical adverse event was anemia, with all patients developing anemia in any grade. The most severe adverse event was neutropenia (n=6; 55%), with three patients developing grade 4 neutropenia (3/11; 27%). The total cost of ipilimumab treatment was &OV0556;483 397, with a median of 43 033 (interquartile range=9555) euros per patient. The median-based CER was 136 675 (28 539-474 865) euros per progression-free year gained and the median-based CER was 100 112 (23 107-374 893) euros per life-year gained. PFS observed in real-world patients was higher than that reported in clinical trials and OS was lower. The incidence of adverse events was higher. The additional cost per progression-free year gained was ∼&OV0556;136 675. The data from this study fill an important need for information on the relative value of this treatment in terms of cost-effectiveness.
评估伊匹单抗治疗转移性黑色素瘤患者的有效性和毒性特征,并在真实世界样本中考察成本效益关系。这是一项多中心、观察性、回顾性队列研究。为评估伊匹单抗治疗的有效性和安全性,记录了无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)及不良事件。进行了经济评估并计算了成本效益比(CER)。纳入11例患者,平均年龄59(标准差 = 11)岁。中位PFS为3.83个月(95%置信区间0.98 - 9.80),中位OS为5.15个月(95%置信区间1.70 - 8.48)。研究纳入的患者均未达到客观缓解。4例(36%)患者病情稳定。最常报告的分析性不良事件是贫血,所有患者均出现任何级别的贫血。最严重的不良事件是中性粒细胞减少(n = 6;55%),3例患者出现4级中性粒细胞减少(3/11;27%)。伊匹单抗治疗的总成本为483397欧元,每位患者的中位数为43033(四分位间距 = 9555)欧元。基于中位数的CER为每获得1年无进展生存期136675(28539 - 474865)欧元,基于中位数的CER为每获得1个生命年100112(23107 - 374893)欧元。真实世界患者中观察到的PFS高于临床试验报告的结果,而OS较低。不良事件发生率较高。每获得1年无进展生存期的额外成本约为136675欧元。本研究数据满足了对该治疗在成本效益方面相对价值信息的重要需求。