Suppr超能文献

打造完美肚脐:近期文献的系统综述

Creating the Perfect Umbilicus: A Systematic Review of Recent Literature.

作者信息

Joseph Walter J, Sinno Sammy, Brownstone Nicholas D, Mirrer Joshua, Thanik Vishal D

机构信息

Institute for Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

NYU Plastic Surgery, 305 E 33rd St, New York, NY, 10016, USA.

出版信息

Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2016 Jun;40(3):372-9. doi: 10.1007/s00266-016-0633-x. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to perform an updated systematic review of the literature over the last 10 years, analyzing and comparing the many published techniques with the hope of providing plastic surgeons with a new standard in creating the perfect umbilicus in the setting of both abdominoplasty and abdominally based free-flap breast reconstruction.

METHODS

An initial search using the PubMed online database with the keyword "umbilicoplasty" was performed. These results were filtered to only include articles published within the last 10 years. The remaining articles were thoroughly reviewed by the authors and only those pertaining to techniques for umbilicoplasty in the setting of abdominoplasty and abdominally based free flap were included.

RESULTS

Of the 10 unique techniques yielded by our search, 9/10 (90 %) initially incised the native umbilicus with a round, oval, or vertical ellipse pattern. Of the 9 techniques that initially perform a round incision, 4 of them (44.4 %) later modify the round umbilicus with either an inferior or superior excision to create either a "U"- or "inverted U"-shaped umbilicus. In terms of the shape of the incision made in the abdominal flap for umbilical reinsertion, the most common were either a round incision or an inverted "V" or "U," both of which accounted for 4/10 (40 %) and 3/10 (30 %), respectively. Almost all of the studies (8/10; 80 %) describe "defatting" or trimming of the subcutaneous adipose tissue around the incision to create a periumbilical concavity following inset of the umbilicus. 4/10 (40 %) of the techniques describe suturing the dermis of the umbilical skin to rectus fascia. Furthermore, 3/10 (30 %) advise that stalk plication is a necessary step to their technique. 7/9 techniques (77.8 %) preferred nondissolvable sutures for skin closure, with nylon being the most common suture material used. Only 2/9 (22.2 %) used dissolvable sutures.

CONCLUSION

Although future studies are necessary, it is our hope that this systematic review better elucidates the techniques and provides some guidance to both aesthetic and reconstructive plastic surgeons in the pursuit of creating the perfect umbilicus following abdominoplasty and TRAM/DIEP breast reconstruction.

NO LEVEL ASSIGNED

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是对过去10年的文献进行更新的系统评价,分析和比较众多已发表的技术,以期为整形外科医生在腹壁成形术和腹部带蒂游离皮瓣乳房重建术中塑造完美肚脐提供新的标准。

方法

使用PubMed在线数据库以“脐成形术”为关键词进行初步检索。对检索结果进行筛选,仅纳入过去10年内发表的文章。作者对其余文章进行了全面审查,仅纳入与腹壁成形术和腹部带蒂游离皮瓣中脐成形术技术相关的文章。

结果

在我们检索出的10种独特技术中,10种中有9种(90%)最初采用圆形、椭圆形或垂直椭圆形模式切开天然肚脐。在最初采用圆形切口的9种技术中,其中4种(44.4%)后来通过向下或向上切除来修改圆形肚脐,以形成“U”形或“倒U”形肚脐。就用于脐重新植入的腹部皮瓣上所做切口的形状而言,最常见的是圆形切口或倒“V”形或“U”形,分别占10种中的4种(40%)和3种(30%)。几乎所有研究(10种中的8种;80%)都描述了在肚脐植入后对切口周围皮下脂肪组织进行“去脂”或修剪,以形成脐周凹陷。10种技术中有4种(40%)描述了将脐部皮肤的真皮缝合到腹直肌筋膜上。此外,10种技术中有3种(30%)建议蒂部折叠是其技术的必要步骤。9种技术中有7种(77.8%)在皮肤缝合时更喜欢使用不可吸收缝线,尼龙是最常用的缝合材料。只有2/9(22.2%)使用可吸收缝线。

结论

尽管未来仍需开展研究,但我们希望本系统评价能更好地阐明这些技术,并为美容整形外科医生和重建整形外科医生在腹壁成形术和横行腹直肌肌皮瓣/腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣乳房重建术后追求塑造完美肚脐提供一些指导。

未指定证据水平

本刊要求作者为每篇文章指定证据水平。有关这些循证医学评级的完整描述,请参阅目录或在线作者指南www.springer.com/00266

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验