Roverud Elin, Best Virginia, Mason Christine R, Swaminathan Jayaganesh, Kidd Gerald
Boston University, MA, USA
Boston University, MA, USA.
Trends Hear. 2016 Apr 8;20:2331216516638516. doi: 10.1177/2331216516638516.
Individuals with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) often experience more difficulty with listening in multisource environments than do normal-hearing (NH) listeners. While the peripheral effects of sensorineural hearing loss certainly contribute to this difficulty, differences in central processing of auditory information may also contribute. To explore this issue, it is important to account for peripheral differences between NH and these hearing-impaired (HI) listeners so that central effects in multisource listening can be examined. In the present study, NH and HI listeners performed a tonal pattern identification task at two distant center frequencies (CFs), 850 and 3500 Hz. In an attempt to control for differences in the peripheral representations of the stimuli, the patterns were presented at the same sensation level (15 dB SL), and the frequency deviation of the tones comprising the patterns was adjusted to obtain equal quiet pattern identification performance across all listeners at both CFs. Tonal sequences were then presented at both CFs simultaneously (informational masking conditions), and listeners were asked either to selectively attend to a source (CF) or to divide attention between CFs and identify the pattern at a CF designated after each trial. There were large differences between groups in the frequency deviations necessary to perform the pattern identification task. After compensating for these differences, there were small differences between NH and HI listeners in the informational masking conditions. HI listeners showed slightly greater performance asymmetry between the low and high CFs than did NH listeners, possibly due to central differences in frequency weighting between groups.
与听力正常(NH)的聆听者相比,感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)个体在多源环境中聆听往往会遇到更多困难。虽然感音神经性听力损失的外周效应肯定是造成这种困难的原因之一,但听觉信息中枢处理方面的差异也可能有影响。为了探究这个问题,考虑NH与这些听力受损(HI)聆听者之间的外周差异很重要,这样才能研究多源聆听中的中枢效应。在本研究中,NH和HI聆听者在两个不同的中心频率(CF),即850和3500赫兹下执行了音调模式识别任务。为了控制刺激外周表征的差异,模式以相同的感觉水平(15分贝感觉级)呈现,并且调整构成模式的音调的频率偏差,以使所有聆听者在两个CF下的安静模式识别表现相等。然后在两个CF同时呈现音调序列(信息掩蔽条件),要求聆听者要么选择性地关注一个声源(CF),要么在CF之间分配注意力,并在每次试验后识别指定CF处的模式。在执行模式识别任务所需的频率偏差方面,组间存在很大差异。在补偿这些差异后,NH和HI聆听者在信息掩蔽条件下的差异很小。HI聆听者在低频和高频CF之间表现出的性能不对称性略高于NH聆听者,这可能是由于组间频率加权的中枢差异所致。