Suppr超能文献

在非语音模式识别任务中测量正常听力和听力受损听众的信息掩蔽。

Informational Masking in Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Measured in a Nonspeech Pattern Identification Task.

作者信息

Roverud Elin, Best Virginia, Mason Christine R, Swaminathan Jayaganesh, Kidd Gerald

机构信息

Boston University, MA, USA

Boston University, MA, USA.

出版信息

Trends Hear. 2016 Apr 8;20:2331216516638516. doi: 10.1177/2331216516638516.

Abstract

Individuals with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) often experience more difficulty with listening in multisource environments than do normal-hearing (NH) listeners. While the peripheral effects of sensorineural hearing loss certainly contribute to this difficulty, differences in central processing of auditory information may also contribute. To explore this issue, it is important to account for peripheral differences between NH and these hearing-impaired (HI) listeners so that central effects in multisource listening can be examined. In the present study, NH and HI listeners performed a tonal pattern identification task at two distant center frequencies (CFs), 850 and 3500 Hz. In an attempt to control for differences in the peripheral representations of the stimuli, the patterns were presented at the same sensation level (15 dB SL), and the frequency deviation of the tones comprising the patterns was adjusted to obtain equal quiet pattern identification performance across all listeners at both CFs. Tonal sequences were then presented at both CFs simultaneously (informational masking conditions), and listeners were asked either to selectively attend to a source (CF) or to divide attention between CFs and identify the pattern at a CF designated after each trial. There were large differences between groups in the frequency deviations necessary to perform the pattern identification task. After compensating for these differences, there were small differences between NH and HI listeners in the informational masking conditions. HI listeners showed slightly greater performance asymmetry between the low and high CFs than did NH listeners, possibly due to central differences in frequency weighting between groups.

摘要

与听力正常(NH)的聆听者相比,感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)个体在多源环境中聆听往往会遇到更多困难。虽然感音神经性听力损失的外周效应肯定是造成这种困难的原因之一,但听觉信息中枢处理方面的差异也可能有影响。为了探究这个问题,考虑NH与这些听力受损(HI)聆听者之间的外周差异很重要,这样才能研究多源聆听中的中枢效应。在本研究中,NH和HI聆听者在两个不同的中心频率(CF),即850和3500赫兹下执行了音调模式识别任务。为了控制刺激外周表征的差异,模式以相同的感觉水平(15分贝感觉级)呈现,并且调整构成模式的音调的频率偏差,以使所有聆听者在两个CF下的安静模式识别表现相等。然后在两个CF同时呈现音调序列(信息掩蔽条件),要求聆听者要么选择性地关注一个声源(CF),要么在CF之间分配注意力,并在每次试验后识别指定CF处的模式。在执行模式识别任务所需的频率偏差方面,组间存在很大差异。在补偿这些差异后,NH和HI聆听者在信息掩蔽条件下的差异很小。HI聆听者在低频和高频CF之间表现出的性能不对称性略高于NH聆听者,这可能是由于组间频率加权的中枢差异所致。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/32d0/4871212/03704e8bb0fc/10.1177_2331216516638516-fig1.jpg

相似文献

2
Impact of stimulus-related factors and hearing impairment on listening effort as indicated by pupil dilation.
Hear Res. 2017 Aug;351:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 25.
4
Evaluation of the preliminary auditory profile test battery in an international multi-centre study.
Int J Audiol. 2013 May;52(5):305-21. doi: 10.3109/14992027.2012.759665.
5
The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
Trends Hear. 2016 Feb 1;20:2331216515626570. doi: 10.1177/2331216515626570.
9
Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners.
Trends Amplif. 2013 Mar;17(1):27-44. doi: 10.1177/1084713813477244. Epub 2013 Feb 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Auditory enhancement in younger and older listeners with normal and impaired hearinga).
J Acoust Soc Am. 2023 Dec 1;154(6):3821-3832. doi: 10.1121/10.0023937.
3
Effects of hearing loss on maintaining and switching attention.
Acta Acust United Acust. 2018;104(5):787-791. doi: 10.3813/aaa.919224. Epub 2018 Sep 1.
5
Cortical and Sensory Causes of Individual Differences in Selective Attention Ability Among Listeners With Normal Hearing Thresholds.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Oct 17;60(10):2976-2988. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-H-17-0080.

本文引用的文献

1
Auditory attention strategy depends on target linguistic properties and spatial configuration.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Jul;138(1):97-114. doi: 10.1121/1.4922328.
2
Auditory attention is divisible: segregated tone streams can be tracked simultaneously.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Apr;41(2):356-63. doi: 10.1037/a0038932. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
3
Independent impacts of age and hearing loss on spatial release in a complex auditory environment.
Front Neurosci. 2013 Dec 23;7:252. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00252. eCollection 2013.
4
The information-divergence hypothesis of informational masking.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Sep;134(3):2160-70. doi: 10.1121/1.4817875.
5
Unilateral and bilateral hearing aids, spatial release from masking and auditory acclimatization.
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Jul;134(1):596-606. doi: 10.1121/1.4807783.
6
On the limit of neural phase locking to fine structure in humans.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2013;787:101-8. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-1590-9_12.
7
Auditory stream segregation for alternating and synchronous tones.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2013 Dec;39(6):1568-1580. doi: 10.1037/a0032241. Epub 2013 Apr 1.
8
Pitch perception.
J Neurosci. 2012 Sep 26;32(39):13335-8. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3815-12.2012.
9
The effects of hearing impairment and aging on spatial processing.
Ear Hear. 2013 Jan-Feb;34(1):15-28. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e3182617f94.
10
Characterizing the dependence of pure-tone frequency difference limens on frequency, duration, and level.
Hear Res. 2012 Oct;292(1-2):1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2012.07.004. Epub 2012 Jul 25.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验