Ohlenforst Barbara, Zekveld Adriana A, Lunner Thomas, Wendt Dorothea, Naylor Graham, Wang Yang, Versfeld Niek J, Kramer Sophia E
Section Ear & Hearing, Dept. of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Eriksholm Research Centre, Oticon A/S, Rørtangvej 20, 3070 Snekkersten, Denmark.
Section Ear & Hearing, Dept. of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, VU University Medical Center and Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden; Linnaeus Centre HEAD, The Swedish Institute for Disability Research, Linköping and Örebro Universities, Linköping, Sweden.
Hear Res. 2017 Aug;351:68-79. doi: 10.1016/j.heares.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 May 25.
Previous research has reported effects of masker type and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on listening effort, as indicated by the peak pupil dilation (PPD) relative to baseline during speech recognition. At about 50% correct sentence recognition performance, increasing SNRs generally results in declining PPDs, indicating reduced effort. However, the decline in PPD over SNRs has been observed to be less pronounced for hearing-impaired (HI) compared to normal-hearing (NH) listeners. The presence of a competing talker during speech recognition generally resulted in larger PPDs as compared to the presence of a fluctuating or stationary background noise. The aim of the present study was to examine the interplay between hearing-status, a broad range of SNRs corresponding to sentence recognition performance varying from 0 to 100% correct, and different masker types (stationary noise and single-talker masker) on the PPD during speech perception. Twenty-five HI and 32 age-matched NH participants listened to sentences across a broad range of SNRs, masked with speech from a single talker (-25 dB to +15 dB SNR) or with stationary noise (-12 dB to +16 dB). Correct sentence recognition scores and pupil responses were recorded during stimulus presentation. With a stationary masker, NH listeners show maximum PPD across a relatively narrow range of low SNRs, while HI listeners show relatively large PPD across a wide range of ecological SNRs. With the single-talker masker, maximum PPD was observed in the mid-range of SNRs around 50% correct sentence recognition performance, while smaller PPDs were observed at lower and higher SNRs. Mixed-model ANOVAs revealed significant interactions between hearing-status and SNR on the PPD for both masker types. Our data show a different pattern of PPDs across SNRs between groups, which indicates that listening and the allocation of effort during listening in daily life environments may be different for NH and HI listeners.
先前的研究报告了掩蔽类型和信噪比(SNR)对听力努力的影响,如在言语识别过程中相对于基线的峰值瞳孔扩张(PPD)所示。在句子识别正确率约为50%时,提高信噪比通常会导致PPD下降,表明听力努力降低。然而,与正常听力(NH)的听众相比,听力受损(HI)的听众在信噪比范围内PPD的下降不太明显。与存在波动或固定背景噪声相比,言语识别过程中存在竞争说话者通常会导致更大的PPD。本研究的目的是考察听力状态、对应于句子识别正确率从0%到100%变化的广泛信噪比范围以及不同掩蔽类型(固定噪声和单说话者掩蔽)在言语感知过程中对PPD的相互作用。25名听力受损者和32名年龄匹配的正常听力参与者听取了广泛信噪比范围内的句子,这些句子由单说话者的语音(信噪比为-25dB至+15dB)或固定噪声(信噪比为-12dB至+16dB)进行掩蔽。在刺激呈现过程中记录句子识别正确分数和瞳孔反应。对于固定掩蔽,正常听力的听众在相对较窄的低信噪比范围内显示出最大PPD,而听力受损的听众在广泛的生态信噪比范围内显示出相对较大的PPD。对于单说话者掩蔽,在句子识别正确率约为50%的信噪比中间范围观察到最大PPD,而在较低和较高信噪比下观察到较小的PPD。混合模型方差分析显示,两种掩蔽类型在PPD上听力状态和信噪比之间均存在显著交互作用。我们的数据显示了两组之间在信噪比范围内PPD的不同模式,这表明在日常生活环境中,正常听力和听力受损的听众在听力以及听力过程中努力的分配可能有所不同。