Bacchi Stephen, Licinio Julio
University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute and Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Acad Psychiatry. 2017 Apr;41(2):185-188. doi: 10.1007/s40596-016-0488-0. Epub 2016 Apr 8.
The authors investigated levels of resilience and psychological distress in medical and psychology students, factors that may affect these levels, the relationship between resilience and psychological distress, and student opinion on causes of stress and possible interventions.
A voluntary anonymous online survey was distributed to University of Adelaide medical and psychology students.
Medical and psychology students (n = 560; response rate = 24.7%) had similar mean resilience and psychological distress scores, and 47.9% of medical students and 55.1% of psychology students were psychologically distressed. Higher levels of resilience were associated with lower levels of distress (p < 0.001). Students supported resilience-based interventions, greater financial support, clearer learning objectives and more continuous assessment as potential means to reduce the effects of stress.
Higher levels of resilience were associated with lower levels of psychological distress. Further studies are required to determine the efficacy of resilience-based interventions in these groups.
作者调查了医学和心理学专业学生的心理韧性水平和心理困扰情况，可能影响这些水平的因素，心理韧性与心理困扰之间的关系，以及学生对压力源和可能干预措施的看法。
向阿德莱德大学的医学和心理学专业学生发放了一份自愿匿名的在线调查问卷。
医学和心理学专业学生（n = 560；回复率 = 24.7%）的心理韧性和心理困扰平均得分相似，47.9%的医学专业学生和55.1%的心理学专业学生存在心理困扰。较高的心理韧性水平与较低的困扰水平相关（p < 0.001）。学生们支持基于心理韧性的干预措施、更多的经济支持、更明确的学习目标以及更多的连续评估，认为这些是减轻压力影响的潜在手段。
较高的心理韧性水平与较低的心理困扰水平相关。需要进一步研究来确定基于心理韧性的干预措施在这些群体中的效果。
