Olsen T, Andersen C U, Plesner H J
Department of Ophthalmology, University of Aarhus, Aarhus Kommunehospital, Denmark.
Br J Ophthalmol. 1989 Mar;73(3):220-4. doi: 10.1136/bjo.73.3.220.
The predictability of a theoretical, computer-assisted IOL calculation method and of the Sanders-Retzlaff-Kraff (SRK) method was evaluated from pre- and postoperative biometry in 110 cataractous patients subjected to a routine IOL calculation. With the theoretical method and the preoperative data the refraction was on the average 0.72 D (SD 0.78) more myopic than expected, an error which could be corrected for by (1) substituting the assumed postoperative chamber depth by the actual mean value and (2) adding 0.16 mm to the preoperative axial length. With the postoperative data the error was 0.05 D (SD 0.78) (p greater than 0.05). By the SRK method the refraction was 0.15 D (SD 0.71) and 0.37 D (SD 0.69) more hyperopic than expected with the pre- and the postoperative data respectively. These offset errors could be corrected for in either case by adjusting the assumed A constant in the SRK formula. With appropriate empirical corrections for offset errors the theoretical and the SRK method were similar in accuracy, that is, about 82% of the predictions within +/- 1 D, 99% within +/- 2 D, and 100% within +/- 3 D error. The variation in postoperative refraction after computerised IOL calculation was about one-third of the variation previously seen after implantation of standard power IOL.
通过对110例接受常规人工晶状体计算的白内障患者术前和术后的生物测量,评估了一种理论性计算机辅助人工晶状体计算方法和桑德斯-雷茨拉夫-克拉夫(SRK)方法的可预测性。采用理论方法和术前数据时,平均屈光不正比预期近视0.72 D(标准差0.78),该误差可通过以下方法校正:(1)用实际平均值代替假定的术后前房深度;(2)术前眼轴长度增加0.16 mm。采用术后数据时,误差为0.05 D(标准差0.78)(p大于0.05)。采用SRK方法时,分别使用术前和术后数据,屈光不正比预期远视0.15 D(标准差0.71)和0.37 D(标准差0.69)。在任何一种情况下,这些偏差误差都可以通过调整SRK公式中假定的A常数来校正。通过对偏差误差进行适当的经验校正,理论方法和SRK方法在准确性上相似,即约82%的预测误差在±1 D以内,99%在±2 D以内,100%在±3 D以内。计算机化人工晶状体计算后术后屈光不正的变化约为先前植入标准屈光度人工晶状体后变化的三分之一。