Suppr超能文献

Binkhorst、Colenbrander和SRK植入物屈光度预测公式准确性的比较。

Comparison of the accuracy of the Binkhorst, Colenbrander, and SRK implant power prediction formulas.

作者信息

Sanders D, Retzlaff J, Kraff M, Kratz R, Gills J, Levine R, Colvard M, Weisel J, Loyd T

出版信息

J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1981 Fall;7(4):337-40. doi: 10.1016/s0146-2776(81)80031-6.

Abstract

The prediction accuracy of the Binkhorst, Colenbrander, and SRK formulas were compared in five series from different sources totalling 654 cases. The SRK formula was superior to both the other formulas by having a smaller average error per case, a smaller range of error from highest minus to highest plus, and a smaller proportion of cases with greater than 2 diopters (D) of error in all five series studied. In four of the five series, the SRK formula also had the greatest proportion of cases with less than 1 D of error. The Colenbrander formula was superior to the Binkhorst formula in all five series with regard to average error, proportion of cases with less than 1 D of error, and proportion of cases with more than 2 D of error. The range of error from highest minus to highest plus was equivalent with the two formulas. All available published literature on the accuracy of implant power prediction formulas was reviewed and appears to support our findings.

摘要

在来自不同来源的五个系列共654例病例中,对宾克霍斯特公式、科伦布兰德公式和SRK公式的预测准确性进行了比较。在所有五个研究系列中,SRK公式均优于其他两个公式,其每例平均误差更小,最高减去最高加上的误差范围更小,误差大于2屈光度(D)的病例比例更小。在五个系列中的四个系列中,SRK公式误差小于1D的病例比例也最高。在所有五个系列中,就平均误差、误差小于1D的病例比例以及误差大于2D的病例比例而言,科伦布兰德公式优于宾克霍斯特公式。最高减去最高加上的误差范围在这两个公式中相当。对所有已发表的关于植入物屈光度预测公式准确性的文献进行了综述,这些文献似乎支持我们的研究结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验