• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

终末期肝病模型评分≥40 分患者行肝移植的全国性结局:共享 35 分的影响。

National Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score ≥40: The Impact of Share 35.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA.

Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA.

出版信息

Am J Transplant. 2016 Oct;16(10):2912-2924. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13823. Epub 2016 May 13.

DOI:10.1111/ajt.13823
PMID:27063579
Abstract

In certain regions of the United States in which organ donor shortages are persistent and competition is high, recipients wait longer and are critically ill with Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) scores ≥40 when they undergo liver transplantation. Recent implementation of Share 35 has increased the percentage of recipients transplanted at these higher MELD scores. The purpose of our study was to examine national data of liver transplant recipients with MELD scores ≥40 and to identify risk factors that affect graft and recipient survival. During the 12-year study period, 5002 adult recipients underwent deceased donor whole-liver transplantation. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year graft survival rates were 77%, 69%, 64% and 50%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year patient survival rates were 80%, 72%, 67% and 53%, respectively. Multivariable analysis identified previous transplant, ventilator dependence, diabetes, hepatitis C virus, age >60 years and prolonged hospitalization prior to transplant as recipient factors increasing the risk of graft failure and death. Donor age >30 years was associated with an incrementally increased risk of graft failure and death. Recipients after implementation of Share 35 had shorter waiting times and higher graft and patient survival compared with pre-Share 35 recipients, demonstrating that some risk factors can be mitigated by policy changes that increase organ accessibility.

摘要

在美国某些器官捐献短缺且竞争激烈的地区,接受者等待时间更长,当他们接受肝移植时,患有终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分≥40 的情况更为严重。最近实施的 Share 35 增加了在这些更高 MELD 评分下进行移植的接受者的比例。我们的研究目的是检查 MELD 评分≥40 的肝移植接受者的全国数据,并确定影响移植物和受者生存的风险因素。在 12 年的研究期间,5002 名成年接受者接受了已故供体全肝移植。1、3、5 和 10 年移植物存活率分别为 77%、69%、64%和 50%。1、3、5 和 10 年患者存活率分别为 80%、72%、67%和 53%。多变量分析确定了先前的移植、呼吸机依赖、糖尿病、丙型肝炎病毒、年龄>60 岁以及移植前住院时间延长是增加移植物失败和死亡风险的受者因素。供体年龄>30 岁与移植物失败和死亡风险的增加呈递增关系。与 Share 35 实施前的接受者相比,实施 Share 35 后的接受者等待时间更短,移植物和患者存活率更高,这表明一些风险因素可以通过增加器官可及性的政策变化来减轻。

相似文献

1
National Outcomes of Liver Transplantation for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score ≥40: The Impact of Share 35.终末期肝病模型评分≥40 分患者行肝移植的全国性结局:共享 35 分的影响。
Am J Transplant. 2016 Oct;16(10):2912-2924. doi: 10.1111/ajt.13823. Epub 2016 May 13.
2
Improvement in the Outcomes of MELD ≥ 40 Liver Transplantation: An Analysis of 207 Consecutive Transplants in a Highly Competitive DSA.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分≥40分的肝移植患者预后改善:对高度竞争的供体特异性抗体(DSA)情况下207例连续肝移植的分析
Transplantation. 2017 Oct;101(10):2360-2367. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000001738.
3
Improved posttransplant mortality after share 35 for liver transplantation.肝脏移植共享35方案后移植后死亡率得到改善。
Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):273-281. doi: 10.1002/hep.29301. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
4
Frequency of whole-organ in lieu of split-liver transplantation over the last decade: Children experienced increased wait time and death.过去十年间,全肝移植而非劈离式肝移植的频率:儿童的等待时间和死亡风险增加。
Am J Transplant. 2019 Nov;19(11):3114-3123. doi: 10.1111/ajt.15481. Epub 2019 Jun 24.
5
Liver transplant recipient survival benefit with living donation in the model for endstage liver disease allocation era.在终末期肝病模型分配时代,活体捐赠对肝移植受者生存获益的影响。
Hepatology. 2011 Oct;54(4):1313-21. doi: 10.1002/hep.24494.
6
Optimizing repeat liver transplant graft utility through strategic matching of donor and recipient characteristics.通过供体和受体特征的策略性匹配优化再次肝移植移植物的效用。
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1365-73. doi: 10.1002/lt.24138.
7
Impact of MELD 30-allocation policy on liver transplant outcomes in Italy.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分30分分配政策对意大利肝移植结局的影响。
J Hepatol. 2022 Mar;76(3):619-627. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.10.024. Epub 2021 Nov 10.
8
Predictors of Survival After Liver Transplantation in Patients With the Highest Acuity (MELD ≥40).最高紧急程度(MELD≥40)患者肝移植后的生存率预测因素。
Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):458-466. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004211.
9
Outcomes for liver transplant candidates listed with low model for end-stage liver disease score.终末期肝病模型评分低的肝移植候选者的结局
Liver Transpl. 2015 Nov;21(11):1403-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.24307.
10
Impact of the model for end-stage liver disease allocation policy on the use of high-risk organs for liver transplantation.终末期肝病分配政策模型对高风险肝脏移植器官使用的影响。
Gastroenterology. 2008 Nov;135(5):1568-74. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2008.08.003.

引用本文的文献

1
Liver Transplant Recipient Characteristics Associated With Worse Post-Transplant Outcomes in Using Elderly Donors.使用老年供体的肝移植受者特征与移植后较差的结果相关。
Transpl Int. 2022 Aug 25;35:10489. doi: 10.3389/ti.2022.10489. eCollection 2022.
2
Outcomes of liver transplant recipients with high MELD scores: an experience from a Canadian centre.高 MELD 评分肝移植受者的结局:来自加拿大中心的经验。
Can J Surg. 2022 Jul 5;65(4):E425-E439. doi: 10.1503/cjs.025520. Print 2022 Jul-Aug.
3
Impact of the Share 35 Policy on Perioperative Management and Mortality in Liver Transplantation Recipients.
分享 35 政策对肝移植受者围手术期管理和死亡率的影响。
Ann Transplant. 2021 Oct 29;26:e932895. doi: 10.12659/AOT.932895.
4
Feasibility of Serial Ultrasound Measurements of the Rectus Femoris Muscle Area to Assess Muscle Loss in Patients Awaiting Liver Transplantation in the Intensive Care Unit.在重症监护病房等待肝移植的患者中,通过连续超声测量股直肌面积评估肌肉损失的可行性。
Transplant Direct. 2020 Oct 20;6(11):e618. doi: 10.1097/TXD.0000000000001067. eCollection 2020 Nov.
5
CON: Patients of Advanced Age Should Not Routinely Undergo Liver Transplantation.反对观点:老年患者不应常规接受肝移植。
Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2019 Sep 2;14(2):70-73. doi: 10.1002/cld.818. eCollection 2019 Aug.
6
Improved posttransplant mortality after share 35 for liver transplantation.肝脏移植共享35方案后移植后死亡率得到改善。
Hepatology. 2018 Jan;67(1):273-281. doi: 10.1002/hep.29301. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
Inequity in organ allocation for patients awaiting liver transplantation: Rationale for uncapping the model for end-stage liver disease.等待肝移植患者的器官分配不平等:取消终末期肝病模型配型限制的理由。
J Hepatol. 2017 Sep;67(3):517-525. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.04.022. Epub 2017 May 5.
8
Patients' Age Rather Than Model of End-Stage Liver Disease Score Predicts Survival After Liver Transplantation.患者年龄而非终末期肝病模型评分可预测肝移植后的生存率。
Dig Dis Sci. 2017 Mar;62(3):801-807. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4423-8. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
9
Single-Center Experience on Liver Transplantation for Model for End-Stage Liver Disease Score 40 Patients.终末期肝病模型评分40分患者肝移植的单中心经验
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Nov;61(11):3346-3353. doi: 10.1007/s10620-016-4274-3. Epub 2016 Aug 18.