Whop Lisa J, Baade Peter, Garvey Gail, Cunningham Joan, Brotherton Julia M L, Lokuge Kamalini, Valery Patricia C, O'Connell Dianne L, Canfell Karen, Diaz Abbey, Roder David, Gertig Dorota M, Moore Suzanne P, Condon John R
Epidemiology and Health Systems Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Brisbane, Australia.
Cancer Council Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 11;11(4):e0150473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0150473. eCollection 2016.
Indigenous Australian women have much higher incidence of cervical cancer compared to non-Indigenous women. Despite an organised cervical screening program introduced 25 years ago, a paucity of Indigenous-identified data in Pap Smear Registers remains. Prevalence of cervical abnormalities detected among the screened Indigenous population has not previously been reported. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of population-based linked health records for 1,334,795 female Queensland residents aged 20-69 years who had one or more Pap smears during 2000-2011; from linked hospital records 23,483 were identified as Indigenous. Prevalence was calculated separately for Indigenous and non-Indigenous women, for cytology-detected low-grade (cLGA) and high-grade abnormalities (cHGA), and histologically confirmed high-grade abnormalities (hHGA). Odds ratios (OR) were estimated from logistic regression analysis. In 2010-2011 the prevalence of hHGA among Indigenous women (16.6 per 1000 women screened, 95% confidence interval [CI] 14.6-18.9) was twice that of non-Indigenous women (7.5 per 1000 women screened, CI 7.3-7.7). Adjusted for age, area-level disadvantage and place of residence, Indigenous women had higher prevalence of cLGA (OR 1.4, CI 1.3-1.4), cHGA (OR 2.2, CI 2.1-2.3) and hHGA (OR 2.0, CI 1.9-2.1). Our findings show that Indigenous women recorded on the Pap Smear Register have much higher prevalence for cLGA, cHGA and hHGA compared to non-Indigenous women. The renewed cervical screening program, to be implemented in 2017, offers opportunities to reduce the burden of abnormalities and invasive cancer among Indigenous women and address long-standing data deficiencies.
与非原住民女性相比,澳大利亚原住民女性宫颈癌的发病率要高得多。尽管25年前就推行了有组织的宫颈癌筛查项目,但巴氏涂片登记册中仍缺乏按原住民身份分类的数据。此前尚未报告过在接受筛查的原住民人群中检测到的宫颈异常情况的患病率。我们对昆士兰州1334795名年龄在20至69岁之间、在2000年至2011年期间进行过一次或多次巴氏涂片检查的女性居民的基于人群的关联健康记录进行了回顾性队列研究;从关联的医院记录中,确定了23483人为原住民。分别计算了原住民和非原住民女性细胞学检测到的低级别(cLGA)和高级别异常(cHGA)以及组织学确诊的高级别异常(hHGA)的患病率。通过逻辑回归分析估计比值比(OR)。在2010年至2011年期间,原住民女性中hHGA的患病率(每1000名接受筛查的女性中有16.6例,95%置信区间[CI]为14.6 - 18.9)是非原住民女性(每1000名接受筛查的女性中有7.5例,CI为7.3 - 7.7)的两倍。在对年龄、地区层面的不利因素和居住地点进行调整后,原住民女性cLGA(OR 1.4,CI 1.3 - 1.4)、cHGA(OR 2.2,CI 2.1 - 2.3)和hHGA(OR 2.0,CI 1.9 - 2.1)的患病率更高。我们的研究结果表明,与非原住民女性相比,在巴氏涂片登记册上记录的原住民女性cLGA、cHGA和hHGA的患病率要高得多。将于2017年实施的新的宫颈癌筛查项目,为减轻原住民女性的异常情况和浸润性癌症负担以及解决长期存在的数据不足问题提供了机会。