Suppr超能文献

直线边缘选择性不足以解释海马旁回位置区的类别选择性。

Rectilinear Edge Selectivity Is Insufficient to Explain the Category Selectivity of the Parahippocampal Place Area.

作者信息

Bryan Peter B, Julian Joshua B, Epstein Russell A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 30;10:137. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00137. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

The parahippocampal place area (PPA) is one of several brain regions that respond more strongly to scenes than to non-scene items such as objects and faces. The mechanism underlying this scene-preferential response remains unclear. One possibility is that the PPA is tuned to low-level stimulus features that are found more often in scenes than in less-preferred stimuli. Supporting this view, Nasr et al. (2014) recently observed that some of the stimuli that are known to strongly activate the PPA contain a large number of rectilinear edges. They further demonstrated that PPA response is modulated by rectilinearity for a range of non-scene images. Motivated by these results, we tested whether rectilinearity suffices to explain PPA selectivity for scenes. In the first experiment, we replicated the previous finding of modulation by rectilinearity in the PPA for arrays of 2-d shapes. However, two further experiments failed to find a rectilinearity effect for faces or scenes: high-rectilinearity faces and scenes did not activate the PPA any more strongly than low-rectilinearity faces and scenes. Moreover, the categorical advantage for scenes vs. faces was maintained in the PPA and two other scene-selective regions-the retrosplenial complex (RSC) and occipital place area (OPA)-when rectilinearity was matched between stimulus sets. We conclude that selectivity for scenes in the PPA cannot be explained by a preference for low-level rectilinear edges.

摘要

海马旁回位置区(PPA)是对场景反应比对物体和面部等非场景项目反应更强烈的几个脑区之一。这种场景优先反应背后的机制尚不清楚。一种可能性是,PPA被调整为对在场景中比在不太受青睐的刺激中更常出现的低水平刺激特征做出反应。支持这一观点的是,纳斯尔等人(2014年)最近观察到,一些已知能强烈激活PPA的刺激包含大量直线边缘。他们进一步证明,对于一系列非场景图像,PPA反应受直线性调节。受这些结果的启发,我们测试了直线性是否足以解释PPA对场景的选择性。在第一个实验中,我们重复了之前关于PPA中二维形状阵列受直线性调节的发现。然而,另外两个实验未能发现面部或场景的直线性效应:高直线性的面部和场景并不比低直线性的面部和场景更强烈地激活PPA。此外,当刺激集之间的直线性相匹配时,PPA以及另外两个场景选择性区域——压后复合体(RSC)和枕叶位置区(OPA)中,场景相对于面部的类别优势依然存在。我们得出结论,PPA对场景的选择性不能用对低水平直线边缘的偏好来解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/132ab585cfd9/fnhum-10-00137-g0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验