• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直线边缘选择性不足以解释海马旁回位置区的类别选择性。

Rectilinear Edge Selectivity Is Insufficient to Explain the Category Selectivity of the Parahippocampal Place Area.

作者信息

Bryan Peter B, Julian Joshua B, Epstein Russell A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 30;10:137. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00137. eCollection 2016.

DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00137
PMID:27064591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4811863/
Abstract

The parahippocampal place area (PPA) is one of several brain regions that respond more strongly to scenes than to non-scene items such as objects and faces. The mechanism underlying this scene-preferential response remains unclear. One possibility is that the PPA is tuned to low-level stimulus features that are found more often in scenes than in less-preferred stimuli. Supporting this view, Nasr et al. (2014) recently observed that some of the stimuli that are known to strongly activate the PPA contain a large number of rectilinear edges. They further demonstrated that PPA response is modulated by rectilinearity for a range of non-scene images. Motivated by these results, we tested whether rectilinearity suffices to explain PPA selectivity for scenes. In the first experiment, we replicated the previous finding of modulation by rectilinearity in the PPA for arrays of 2-d shapes. However, two further experiments failed to find a rectilinearity effect for faces or scenes: high-rectilinearity faces and scenes did not activate the PPA any more strongly than low-rectilinearity faces and scenes. Moreover, the categorical advantage for scenes vs. faces was maintained in the PPA and two other scene-selective regions-the retrosplenial complex (RSC) and occipital place area (OPA)-when rectilinearity was matched between stimulus sets. We conclude that selectivity for scenes in the PPA cannot be explained by a preference for low-level rectilinear edges.

摘要

海马旁回位置区(PPA)是对场景反应比对物体和面部等非场景项目反应更强烈的几个脑区之一。这种场景优先反应背后的机制尚不清楚。一种可能性是,PPA被调整为对在场景中比在不太受青睐的刺激中更常出现的低水平刺激特征做出反应。支持这一观点的是,纳斯尔等人(2014年)最近观察到,一些已知能强烈激活PPA的刺激包含大量直线边缘。他们进一步证明,对于一系列非场景图像,PPA反应受直线性调节。受这些结果的启发,我们测试了直线性是否足以解释PPA对场景的选择性。在第一个实验中,我们重复了之前关于PPA中二维形状阵列受直线性调节的发现。然而,另外两个实验未能发现面部或场景的直线性效应:高直线性的面部和场景并不比低直线性的面部和场景更强烈地激活PPA。此外,当刺激集之间的直线性相匹配时,PPA以及另外两个场景选择性区域——压后复合体(RSC)和枕叶位置区(OPA)中,场景相对于面部的类别优势依然存在。我们得出结论,PPA对场景的选择性不能用对低水平直线边缘的偏好来解释。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/379b12c7bd6b/fnhum-10-00137-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/132ab585cfd9/fnhum-10-00137-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/3c47c93f6dea/fnhum-10-00137-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/523b47743b2c/fnhum-10-00137-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/637c69b9f492/fnhum-10-00137-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/379b12c7bd6b/fnhum-10-00137-g0005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/132ab585cfd9/fnhum-10-00137-g0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/3c47c93f6dea/fnhum-10-00137-g0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/523b47743b2c/fnhum-10-00137-g0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/637c69b9f492/fnhum-10-00137-g0004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d402/4811863/379b12c7bd6b/fnhum-10-00137-g0005.jpg

相似文献

1
Rectilinear Edge Selectivity Is Insufficient to Explain the Category Selectivity of the Parahippocampal Place Area.直线边缘选择性不足以解释海马旁回位置区的类别选择性。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2016 Mar 30;10:137. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00137. eCollection 2016.
2
Thinking outside the box: rectilinear shapes selectively activate scene-selective cortex.跳出固有思维:直线形状可选择性地激活场景选择性大脑皮层。
J Neurosci. 2014 May 14;34(20):6721-35. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4802-13.2014.
3
Visual high-level regions respond to high-level stimulus content in the absence of low-level confounds.在没有低水平干扰因素的情况下,视觉高级区域对高级刺激内容产生反应。
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:520-525. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.011. Epub 2016 Mar 11.
4
The occipital place area represents first-person perspective motion information through scenes.枕叶位置区域通过场景呈现第一人称视角的运动信息。
Cortex. 2016 Oct;83:17-26. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
5
Functional Subdomains within Scene-Selective Cortex: Parahippocampal Place Area, Retrosplenial Complex, and Occipital Place Area.场景选择性皮层内的功能亚区:海马旁回位置区、压后复合体和枕叶位置区。
J Neurosci. 2016 Oct 5;36(40):10257-10273. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4033-14.2016.
6
The occipital place area is causally and selectively involved in scene perception.枕叶位置区域与场景感知存在因果和选择性联系。
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 23;33(4):1331-6a. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4081-12.2013.
7
Prolonged functional development of the parahippocampal place area and occipital place area.旁海马体位置区域和枕叶位置区域的功能发育延长。
Neuroimage. 2019 May 1;191:104-115. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.02.025. Epub 2019 Feb 11.
8
Full scenes produce more activation than close-up scenes and scene-diagnostic objects in parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortex: an fMRI study.全场景比特写场景和海马旁回及压后皮质中的场景诊断性物体产生更多激活:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain Cogn. 2008 Feb;66(1):40-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
9
The occipital place area represents the local elements of scenes.枕叶位置区域代表场景的局部元素。
Neuroimage. 2016 May 15;132:417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.02.062. Epub 2016 Feb 27.
10
Neural representation of geometry and surface properties in object and scene perception.物体和场景感知中的几何和表面属性的神经表示。
Neuroimage. 2017 Aug 15;157:586-597. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.043. Epub 2017 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Distributed network flows generate localized category selectivity in human visual cortex.分布式网络流在人类视觉皮层中产生局部类别选择性。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2024 Oct 22;20(10):e1012507. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012507. eCollection 2024 Oct.
2
Retinotopy drives the variation in scene responses across visual field map divisions of the occipital place area.视网膜投射驱动了枕叶位置区域视场图划分中场景反应的变化。
J Vis. 2024 Aug 1;24(8):10. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.8.10.
3
Category Trumps Shape as an Organizational Principle of Object Space in the Human Occipitotemporal Cortex.

本文引用的文献

1
Fourier power, subjective distance, and object categories all provide plausible models of BOLD responses in scene-selective visual areas.傅里叶功率、主观距离和物体类别都为场景选择性视觉区域的血氧水平依赖反应提供了合理的模型。
Front Comput Neurosci. 2015 Nov 5;9:135. doi: 10.3389/fncom.2015.00135. eCollection 2015.
2
Outside Looking In: Landmark Generalization in the Human Navigational System.置身事外:人类导航系统中的地标泛化
J Neurosci. 2015 Nov 4;35(44):14896-908. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2270-15.2015.
3
Discrimination of Visual Categories Based on Behavioral Relevance in Widespread Regions of Frontoparietal Cortex.
类别胜过形状,成为人类枕颞皮质中物体空间的组织原则。
J Neurosci. 2023 Apr 19;43(16):2960-2972. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2179-22.2023. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
4
A stimulus-driven approach reveals vertical luminance gradient as a stimulus feature that drives human cortical scene selectivity.刺激驱动的方法揭示了垂直亮度梯度作为一种刺激特征,驱动人类皮质场景选择性。
Neuroimage. 2023 Apr 1;269:119935. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.119935. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
5
Pulvinar Response Profiles and Connectivity Patterns to Object Domains.树突小球反应特征与物体域的连接模式。
J Neurosci. 2023 Feb 1;43(5):812-826. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0613-22.2022. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
6
Non-invasive neurostimulation modulates processing of spatial frequency information in rapid perception of faces.非侵入性神经刺激调节快速感知面孔时空间频率信息的处理。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan;84(1):150-160. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02384-0. Epub 2021 Oct 19.
7
"Scene" from inside: The representation of Observer's space in high-level visual cortex.内部场景:高级视觉皮层中观察者空间的表示。
Neuropsychologia. 2021 Oct 15;161:108010. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108010. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
8
On the relationship between maps and domains in inferotemporal cortex.关于下颞叶皮质中地图与领域之间的关系。
Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021 Sep;22(9):573-583. doi: 10.1038/s41583-021-00490-4. Epub 2021 Aug 3.
9
Topography of Visual Features in the Human Ventral Visual Pathway.人类腹侧视觉通路上的视觉特征的地形。
Neurosci Bull. 2021 Oct;37(10):1454-1468. doi: 10.1007/s12264-021-00734-4. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
10
Object representations in the human brain reflect the co-occurrence statistics of vision and language.人类大脑中的物体表示反映了视觉和语言的共现统计数据。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jul 2;12(1):4081. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24368-2.
基于行为相关性在额顶叶皮层广泛区域对视觉类别进行辨别
J Neurosci. 2015 Sep 9;35(36):12383-93. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1134-15.2015.
4
Patterns of neural response in scene-selective regions of the human brain are affected by low-level manipulations of spatial frequency.人类大脑场景选择性区域的神经反应模式会受到空间频率低水平操纵的影响。
Neuroimage. 2016 Jan 1;124(Pt A):107-117. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.058. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
5
A Retinotopic Basis for the Division of High-Level Scene Processing between Lateral and Ventral Human Occipitotemporal Cortex.人类枕颞叶外侧和腹侧高级场景处理分工的视网膜拓扑基础
J Neurosci. 2015 Aug 26;35(34):11921-35. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0137-15.2015.
6
Spatial frequency processing in scene-selective cortical regions.场景选择性皮质区域中的空间频率处理
Neuroimage. 2015 May 15;112:86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.058. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
7
Thinking outside the box: rectilinear shapes selectively activate scene-selective cortex.跳出固有思维:直线形状可选择性地激活场景选择性大脑皮层。
J Neurosci. 2014 May 14;34(20):6721-35. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4802-13.2014.
8
Task context impacts visual object processing differentially across the cortex.任务上下文会对大脑皮层的视觉对象处理产生不同的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Mar 11;111(10):E962-71. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312567111. Epub 2014 Feb 24.
9
Nonaccidental properties underlie human categorization of complex natural scenes.非偶然属性是人类对复杂自然场景进行分类的基础。
Psychol Sci. 2014 Apr;25(4):851-60. doi: 10.1177/0956797613512662. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
10
The occipital place area is causally and selectively involved in scene perception.枕叶位置区域与场景感知存在因果和选择性联系。
J Neurosci. 2013 Jan 23;33(4):1331-6a. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4081-12.2013.