Suppr超能文献

口服给药后与排泄后强化相比,育肥牛粪堆肥中抗菌药物的消散情况。

Dissipation of Antimicrobials in Feedlot Manure Compost after Oral Administration versus Fortification after Excretion.

作者信息

Amarakoon Inoka D, Zvomuya Francis, Sura Srinivas, Larney Francis J, Cessna Allan J, Xu Shanwei, McAllister Tim A

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2016 Mar;45(2):503-10. doi: 10.2134/jeq2015.07.0408.

Abstract

Fortification of manure with antimicrobials is one approach to studying their dissipation. However, fortified antimicrobials may not accurately model dissipation that occurs after antimicrobials have been administered to livestock in feed and excreted in manure. This study examined the dissipation of antimicrobials excreted in manure versus those added directly to manure (fortified). Steers were fed a diet containing (kg feed) (i) 44 mg chlortetracycline, (ii) 44 mg each of chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine, (iii) 11 mg tylosin, and (iv) no antimicrobials (control). Fortified antimicrobial treatments were prepared by adding antimicrobials to control manure. Manure was composted for 30 d, sampled every 2 to 3 d, and analyzed for antimicrobials and compost properties. Antimicrobial dissipation followed first-order kinetics. The dissipation rate constant was significantly greater (based on 95% confidence limit) for excreted (0.29-0.54 d) than for fortified chlortetracycline (0.11-0.13 d). In contrast, dissipation rate constants were significantly greater for fortified sulfamethazine (0.47 d) and tylosin (0.31 d) than when the same antimicrobials were excreted (0.08 and 0.07 d, respectively). On average, 85 to 99% of the initial antimicrobial concentrations in manure were dissipated after 30 d of composting. The degree of dissipation was greater ( < 0.0001) for fortified (99%) than for excreted tylosin (85%). Composting can be used to reduce environmental loading of antimicrobials before field application of beef cattle manure. Dissipation rates of fortified antimicrobials during manure composting may not accurately reflect those of antimicrobials that are consumed and excreted by cattle.

摘要

用抗菌剂强化粪便(添加抗菌剂)是研究其消散情况的一种方法。然而,强化的抗菌剂可能无法准确模拟抗菌剂在饲料中施用于牲畜并随粪便排出后发生的消散情况。本研究考察了随粪便排出的抗菌剂与直接添加到粪便中的抗菌剂(强化抗菌剂)的消散情况。给阉牛饲喂含(每千克饲料)(i) 44毫克金霉素、(ii) 各44毫克金霉素和磺胺二甲嘧啶、(iii) 11毫克泰乐菌素以及(iv) 不添加抗菌剂(对照)的日粮。通过向对照粪便中添加抗菌剂来制备强化抗菌剂处理组。粪便堆肥30天,每2至3天取样一次,并分析抗菌剂和堆肥特性。抗菌剂的消散遵循一级动力学。排出的抗菌剂(0.29 - 0.54天)的消散速率常数显著高于强化金霉素(0.11 - 0.13天)(基于95%置信限)。相比之下,强化磺胺二甲嘧啶(0.47天)和泰乐菌素(0.31天)的消散速率常数显著高于相同抗菌剂随粪便排出时的消散速率常数(分别为0.08天和0.07天)。堆肥30天后,粪便中初始抗菌剂浓度平均消散了85%至99%。强化泰乐菌素(99%)的消散程度高于随粪便排出的泰乐菌素(85%)(P < 0.0001)。在肉牛粪便田间施用前,堆肥可用于减少抗菌剂对环境的负荷。粪便堆肥过程中强化抗菌剂的消散速率可能无法准确反映牛摄入并排出的抗菌剂的消散速率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验