Newman Constance, Ng Crystal, Pacqué-Margolis Sara, Frymus Diana
IntraHealth International, 6340 Quadrangle Drive, Suite 200, Chapel Hill, NC, 27517, USA.
United States Agency for International Development, 2100 Crystal Drive, Arlington, VA, 22202, USA.
Hum Resour Health. 2016 Apr 12;14:14. doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0109-8.
Gender discrimination and inequality in health professional education (HPE) affect students and faculty and hinder production of the robust health workforces needed to meet health and development goals, yet HPE reformers pay scant attention to these gender barriers. Gender equality must be a core value and professional practice competency for all actors in HPE and health employment systems.
Peer-review and non-peer-review literature previously identified in a review of the literature identified interventions to counter gender discrimination and inequality in HPE and tertiary education systems in North America and the Caribbean; West, East, and Southern Africa; Asia; the Middle East and North Africa; Europe; Australia; and South America. An assessment considered 51 interventions addressing sexual harassment (18), caregiver discrimination (27), and gender equality (6). Reviewers with expertise in gender and health system strengthening rated and ranked interventions according to six gender-transformative criteria.
Thirteen interventions were considered to have transformational potential to address gender-related obstacles to entry, retention, career progression, and graduation in HPE, when implemented in core sets of interventions. The review identified one set with potential to counter sexual harassment in HPE and two sets to counter caregiver discrimination. Gender centers and equal employment opportunity units are structural interventions that can address multiple forms of gender discrimination and inequality.
The paper's broad aim is to encourage HPE leaders to make gender-transformative reforms in the current way of doing business and commit to themselves to countering gender discrimination and inequality. Interventions to counter gender discrimination should be seen as integral parts of institutional and instructional reforms and essential investments to scale up quality HPE and recruit and retain health workers in the systems that educate and employ them. Implementation challenges spanning financial, informational, and cultural barriers need consideration. The application of core sets of interventions and a strong learning agenda should be part of ongoing HPE reform efforts.
卫生专业教育(HPE)中的性别歧视和不平等影响着学生和教师,阻碍了培养满足卫生与发展目标所需的强大卫生人力,然而HPE改革者对这些性别障碍关注甚少。性别平等必须成为HPE和卫生就业系统中所有行为者的核心价值观和专业实践能力。
在对北美和加勒比地区、西非、东非和南非、亚洲、中东和北非、欧洲、澳大利亚以及南美洲的HPE和高等教育系统中消除性别歧视和不平等的干预措施进行的文献综述中,先前已确定了同行评审和非同行评审文献。一项评估考虑了51项针对性骚扰(18项)、照顾者歧视(27项)和性别平等(6项)的干预措施。具有性别与卫生系统强化专业知识的评审人员根据六个性别变革标准对干预措施进行了评分和排名。
当在核心干预措施组合中实施时,有13项干预措施被认为具有变革潜力,可解决HPE中与性别相关的入学、留校、职业发展和毕业障碍。该综述确定了一组有潜力消除HPE中性骚扰的措施,以及两组消除照顾者歧视的措施。性别中心和平等就业机会单位是可以解决多种形式性别歧视和不平等的结构性干预措施。
本文的广泛目标是鼓励HPE领导者对当前的业务方式进行性别变革改革,并致力于消除性别歧视和不平等。消除性别歧视的干预措施应被视为机构和教学改革的组成部分,以及扩大优质HPE规模并在教育和雇用卫生工作者的系统中招募和留住他们的必要投资。需要考虑跨越财务、信息和文化障碍的实施挑战。核心干预措施组合的应用和强有力的学习议程应成为正在进行的HPE改革努力的一部分。