Crucitti Pierfilippo, Mangiameli Giuseppe, Petitti Tommasangelo, Condoluci Adalgisa, Rocco Raffaele, Gallo Ida Francesca, Longo Filippo, Rocco Gaetano
Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Vascular Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Section of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Vascular Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Dec;50(6):1019-1024. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw125. Epub 2016 Apr 10.
A systematic review of English and non-English articles using OVID MEDLINE (1980-2014) was performed to evaluate the potential value of prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct in preventing chylous leakage after oesophagectomy for cancer. Search terms included [Oesophagectomy OR esophagectomy] AND [chylothorax] AND [thoracic duct ligation]. Only those papers that directly compared the incidence of chylothorax in patients who underwent prophylactic ligation [ligation group (LG)] with that in those who had conservative treatment were selected [preservation group (PG)]; all the articles presenting original data and supplying sufficient information on the chylothorax rate after oesophagectomy were included. Independent extraction of articles was performed by two authors using predefined data fields, including study quality indicators. The PRISMA guidelines were carefully adhered to. A total of 5254 subjects were included in the 7 clinical studies examined into the current meta-analysis. Of these, 2179 patients underwent prophylactic ligature of the thoracic duct (LG group) and 3075 had preservation of the thoracic duct (PG group). A significant difference in terms of chylothorax rate [odd ratios (ORs) 0.47 in favour of LG, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.80] was noted between the LG group and the PG group. According to our meta-analysis and taking into account-specific caveats, prophylactic ligation of the thoracic duct could be considered as an effective preventative measure to reduce the incidence of postoperative chylothorax.
为评估预防性结扎胸导管在预防食管癌切除术后乳糜漏方面的潜在价值,我们使用OVID MEDLINE(1980 - 2014年)对英文和非英文文章进行了系统评价。检索词包括[食管切除术或esophagectomy] AND [乳糜胸] AND [胸导管结扎]。仅选择那些直接比较接受预防性结扎患者[结扎组(LG)]与接受保守治疗患者[保留组(PG)]乳糜胸发生率的论文;纳入了所有呈现原始数据并提供食管癌切除术后乳糜胸发生率足够信息的文章。由两位作者使用预定义的数据字段(包括研究质量指标)独立提取文章。严格遵循PRISMA指南。纳入本次荟萃分析的7项临床研究共5254名受试者。其中,2179例患者接受了胸导管预防性结扎(LG组),3075例患者保留了胸导管(PG组)。LG组和PG组在乳糜胸发生率方面存在显著差异[优势比(OR)为0.47,支持LG组,95%置信区间(CI)为0.27 - 0.80]。根据我们的荟萃分析并考虑到特定的注意事项,胸导管预防性结扎可被视为降低术后乳糜胸发生率的有效预防措施。