Galiñanes Edgar Luis, Krajcer Zvonimir
Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA.
Department of Cardiology, Texas Heart Institute, Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA.
Aorta (Stamford). 2015 Aug 1;3(4):136-9. doi: 10.12945/j.aorta.2015.14.049. eCollection 2015 Aug.
For patients with coarctation of the aorta (CoA), surgical intervention results in an overall survival rate nearly twice that of medical management. Therefore, surgical correction of CoA has traditionally been warranted in the majority of patients, even though open repair entails its own complications. With the advent of endovascular technology, many interventionalists hoped that this approach would decrease the complications associated with open surgical repair of CoA. Nevertheless, there is still an ongoing debate about the merits of traditional open surgery versus endovascular therapy. In this review, we discuss the role of these two approaches for the management of CoA, recoarctation, and coarctation-related aneurysms.
对于患有主动脉缩窄(CoA)的患者,手术干预的总体生存率几乎是药物治疗的两倍。因此,传统上大多数患者都需要进行CoA的手术矫正,尽管开放修复本身也有其并发症。随着血管内技术的出现,许多介入专家希望这种方法能减少与CoA开放手术修复相关的并发症。然而,关于传统开放手术与血管内治疗的优缺点仍存在争议。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了这两种方法在CoA、再缩窄以及与缩窄相关的动脉瘤治疗中的作用。