Suppr超能文献

比较肌肉游离皮瓣和筋膜皮游离皮瓣在下肢重建中的应用——这重要吗?

Comparing Muscle and Fasciocutaneous Free Flaps in Lower Extremity Reconstruction--Does It Matter?

作者信息

Paro John, Chiou Grace, Sen Subhro K

机构信息

From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.

出版信息

Ann Plast Surg. 2016 May;76 Suppl 3:S213-5. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000779.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Plastic surgeons are often asked to assist with the reconstruction of lower extremity wounds. These patients many times require free tissue transfer for coverage given paucity of soft tissue. Anecdotally, many orthopedic surgeons prefer muscle coverage--particularly in the setting of potentially infected bone. Today's surgeons now easily harvest and transfer fasciocutaneous flaps--a versatile option with less donor-site morbidity. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in outcomes between these 2 types of reconstruction.

METHODS

We performed a single-institution retrospective review of lower extremity free flap reconstructions in the last 10 years. Demographics, preoperative and postoperative course, and the documented time to weight-bearing and bony union were collected. Major cohorts compared were muscle free flaps and fasciocutaneous free flaps, further divided into subgroups including acute trauma, tumor resection, osteomyelitis, and nonunion. Data comparisons were made using paired t test and Fischer exact tests.

RESULTS

There were 121 patients who met inclusion criteria--86 in the muscle flap group, and 35 in the fasciocutaneous group and demographics were equal. Total complication rates were higher in smokers than nonsmokers (P < 0.03). There was no significant difference in major or minor complication rates between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps in any subgroup. In both the acute fracture group and the infected nonunion group, there was a significantly faster return to weight bearing in the fasciocutaneous group (P < 0.03) although there was no difference in documented time to bony union. Patients who underwent fasciocutaneous reconstruction were more likely to require revisionary surgery for improved aesthetics (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest that in essentially all clinical parameters, there is no difference between free flap type used for soft tissue coverage of the lower extremity. Patients undergoing reconstruction with a fasciocutaneous flap may return to weight bearing earlier--although they are more likely to require elective flap revisions. These results imply essentially equivalent outcomes regardless of flap type or operative indication, in contrast with some of the biases in the orthopedic community. The particular flap chosen for any reconstruction should remain solely at the discretion of the plastic surgeon.

摘要

引言

整形外科医生经常被要求协助进行下肢伤口的重建。由于软组织匮乏,这些患者很多时候需要进行游离组织移植来覆盖创面。据传闻,许多骨科医生更喜欢肌肉覆盖——特别是在可能存在感染骨的情况下。如今的外科医生现在能够轻松获取并移植筋膜皮瓣——这是一种多功能的选择,供区并发症较少。我们推测这两种重建方式的结果不会有差异。

方法

我们对过去10年中在本机构进行的下肢游离皮瓣重建进行了单中心回顾性研究。收集了人口统计学资料、术前和术后病程,以及记录的负重时间和骨愈合时间。主要比较的队列是游离肌肉皮瓣和游离筋膜皮瓣,进一步分为急性创伤、肿瘤切除、骨髓炎和骨不连等亚组。数据比较采用配对t检验和费舍尔精确检验。

结果

有121例患者符合纳入标准——肌肉皮瓣组86例,筋膜皮瓣组35例,人口统计学资料相当。吸烟者的总并发症发生率高于不吸烟者(P < 0.03)。在任何亚组中,肌肉皮瓣和筋膜皮瓣的主要或次要并发症发生率均无显著差异。在急性骨折组和感染性骨不连组中,筋膜皮瓣组的负重恢复明显更快(P < 0.03),尽管记录的骨愈合时间没有差异。接受筋膜皮瓣重建的患者更有可能因改善美观而需要进行修复手术(P < 0.001)。

结论

我们的数据表明,在基本上所有临床参数方面,用于下肢软组织覆盖的游离皮瓣类型之间没有差异。接受筋膜皮瓣重建的患者可能更早恢复负重——尽管他们更有可能需要进行选择性皮瓣修复。这些结果表明,无论皮瓣类型或手术指征如何,结果基本相当,这与骨科界的一些偏见形成对比。任何重建所选择的特定皮瓣应完全由整形外科医生自行决定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验