Dalili Michael N, Schofield-Toloza Lawrence, Munafò Marcus R, Penton-Voak Ian S
a MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) , University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
b School of Experimental Psychology , University of Bristol , Bristol , UK.
Cogn Emot. 2017 Aug;31(5):858-867. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2016.1169999. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
Many cognitive bias modification (CBM) tasks use facial expressions of emotion as stimuli. Some tasks use unique facial stimuli, while others use composite stimuli, given evidence that emotion is encoded prototypically. However, CBM using composite stimuli may be identity- or emotion-specific, and may not generalise to other stimuli. We investigated the generalisability of effects using composite faces in two experiments. Healthy adults in each study were randomised to one of four training conditions: two stimulus-congruent conditions, where same faces were used during all phases of the task, and two stimulus-incongruent conditions, where faces of the opposite sex (Experiment 1) or faces depicting another emotion (Experiment 2) were used after the modification phase. Our results suggested that training effects generalised across identities. However, our results indicated only partial generalisation across emotions. These findings suggest effects obtained using composite stimuli may extend beyond the stimuli used in the task but remain emotion-specific.
许多认知偏差修正(CBM)任务使用情绪的面部表情作为刺激。一些任务使用独特的面部刺激,而其他任务使用合成刺激,因为有证据表明情绪是以原型方式编码的。然而,使用合成刺激的CBM可能是特定身份或特定情绪的,并且可能无法推广到其他刺激。我们在两项实验中研究了使用合成面孔的效果的可推广性。每项研究中的健康成年人被随机分配到四种训练条件之一:两种刺激一致条件,即在任务的所有阶段使用相同的面孔,以及两种刺激不一致条件,即在修正阶段后使用异性面孔(实验1)或描绘另一种情绪的面孔(实验2)。我们的结果表明训练效果在不同身份之间具有可推广性。然而,我们的结果仅表明在不同情绪之间有部分可推广性。这些发现表明,使用合成刺激获得的效果可能超出任务中使用的刺激,但仍然是特定情绪的。