Gall Christine, Wetzel Randall, Kolker Alexander, Kanter Robert K, Toltzis Philip
1Virtual PICU Systems, LLC, Los Angeles, CA.2Department of Pediatrics and Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital Los Angeles, USC Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.3API Healthcare, A GE Healthcare Company, Hartford, WI.4Department of Pediatrics, Virginia Tech Carilion School of Medicine, Roanoke, VA.5National Center for Disaster Preparedness, Columbia University, New York, NY.6Case Western University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.7Rainbow Babies and Children's Hospital, Cleveland, OH.
Crit Care Med. 2016 Sep;44(9):1762-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001759.
To develop and validate an algorithm to guide selection of patients for pediatric critical care admission during a severe pandemic when Crisis Standards of Care are implemented.
Retrospective observational study using secondary data.
Children admitted to VPS-participating PICUs between 2009-2012.
A total of 111,174 randomly selected nonelective cases from the Virtual PICU Systems database were used to estimate each patient's probability of death and duration of ventilation employing previously derived predictive equations. Using real and projected statistics for the State of Ohio as an example, triage thresholds were established for casualty volumes ranging from 5,000 to 10,000 for a modeled pandemic with peak duration of 6 weeks and 280 pediatric intensive care beds. The goal was to simultaneously maximize casualty survival and bed occupancy. Discrete Event Simulation was used to determine triage thresholds for probability of death and duration of ventilation as a function of casualty volume and the total number of available beds. Simulation was employed to compare survival between the proposed triage algorithm and a first come first served distribution of scarce resources.
Population survival was greater using the triage thresholds compared with a first come first served strategy. In this model, for five, six, seven, eight, and 10 thousand casualties, the triage algorithm increased the number of lives saved by 284, 386, 547, 746, and 1,089, respectively, compared with first come first served (all p < 0.001).
Use of triage thresholds based on probability of death and duration of mechanical ventilation determined from actual critically ill children's data demonstrated superior population survival during a simulated overwhelming pandemic.
开发并验证一种算法,用于在实施危机护理标准的严重大流行期间指导儿科重症监护入院患者的选择。
使用二次数据的回顾性观察研究。
2009年至2012年期间入住参与VPS的儿科重症监护病房的儿童。
从虚拟儿科重症监护系统数据库中随机选取111,174例非选择性病例,采用先前推导的预测方程估计每位患者的死亡概率和通气时间。以俄亥俄州的实际和预测统计数据为例,针对模拟大流行(高峰持续时间为6周,有280张儿科重症监护病床)伤亡人数从5000至10000的情况设定了分诊阈值。目标是同时使伤亡者生存率和床位占用率最大化。使用离散事件模拟来确定作为伤亡人数和可用床位总数函数的死亡概率和通气时间的分诊阈值。通过模拟比较所提议的分诊算法与稀缺资源先到先得分配方式之间的生存率。
与先到先得策略相比,使用分诊阈值时总体生存率更高。在该模型中,对于5000、6000、7000、8000和10000名伤亡者,与先到先得相比,分诊算法分别多挽救了284、386、547、746和1089条生命(所有p<0.001)。
基于实际危重症儿童数据确定的死亡概率和机械通气时间的分诊阈值,在模拟的压倒性大流行期间显示出更高的总体生存率。