Paek Se Hyun, Kang Kyung Ho, Kang Hyun, Park Sung Jun
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Mokdong Hospital, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University Hospital and Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, 224-1, Heuk Seok-Dong, Dongjak-Ku, Seoul, 156-755, Republic of Korea.
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3861-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4689-5. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
Robotic thyroid surgery using the da Vinci surgical system has certain cosmetic advantages; however, the invasiveness of robotic thyroid surgery is still a concern to many surgeons. Previous research has not directly compared the surgical stress of robotic thyroidectomy with that of conventional open surgery. The aim of the present study was to evaluate surgical stress using postsurgical measurements of several clinical markers.
A pilot study was performed to evaluate surgical stress following robotic and open thyroid surgery. A total of 29 papillary thyroid cancer patients from July to November 2014 were enrolled. Fourteen patients underwent conventional open surgery, and fifteen underwent robotic thyroidectomy. IL-6 levels, serum WBC counts, CRP levels, surgical plethysmographic index (SPI), and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were measured to compare surgical stress between the robotic and the open surgery groups.
No significant differences were seen between the two groups in IL-6 level, WBC count or CRP level (p = 0.380, 0.374, 0.360, respectively). Mean SPI level during the surgery was 41.9 ± 4.7 in open group compared to 39.5 ± 2.2 in robotic group, though this finding showed borderline significance (p = 0.095). VAS score after open surgery was significantly higher than after robotic operation (p = 0.048).
The results of this study suggest that robotic thyroidectomy can result in a less than equivocal systemic stress response than is seen in open thyroidectomy. However, further investigation including large-scale, prospective, multicenter studies is warranted for non-inferiority trials.
使用达芬奇手术系统进行机器人甲状腺手术具有一定的美容优势;然而,机器人甲状腺手术的侵入性仍是许多外科医生关注的问题。以往的研究尚未直接比较机器人甲状腺切除术与传统开放手术的手术应激情况。本研究的目的是通过术后对几种临床指标的测量来评估手术应激。
进行一项前瞻性研究以评估机器人甲状腺手术和开放甲状腺手术后的手术应激。纳入了2014年7月至11月的29例甲状腺乳头状癌患者。14例患者接受传统开放手术,15例接受机器人甲状腺切除术。测量白细胞介素-6水平、血清白细胞计数、C反应蛋白水平、手术体积描记指数(SPI)和视觉模拟评分(VAS),以比较机器人手术组和开放手术组之间的手术应激。
两组在白细胞介素-6水平、白细胞计数或C反应蛋白水平上无显著差异(p分别为0.380、0.374、0.360)。开放手术组手术期间的平均SPI水平为41.9±4.7,而机器人手术组为39.5±2.2,尽管这一结果显示出临界显著性(p = 0.095)。开放手术后的VAS评分显著高于机器人手术后(p = 0.048)。
本研究结果表明,机器人甲状腺切除术所导致的全身应激反应可能比开放甲状腺切除术轻。然而,对于非劣效性试验,需要进行包括大规模、前瞻性、多中心研究在内的进一步调查。