Pessina Federico, Navarria Pierina, Cozzi Luca, Ascolese Anna Maria, Simonelli Matteo, Santoro Armando, Tomatis Stefano, Riva Marco, Fava Enrica, Scorsetti Marta, Bello Lorenzo
Department of Neurosurgery, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy.
Department of Radiotherapy, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Sep;23(9):3040-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5222-3. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
Current treatments in grade III gliomas include surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. The value of the entity of surgical resection remains an open question. The aim of this evaluation was to analyze the impact of extent of resection (EOR) and residual tumor volume (RTV) on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with newly diagnosed grade III gliomas.
Overall, 136 patients were included in this evaluation. EOR and RTV were defined in all patients on postoperative volumetric magnetic resonance imaging, with EOR being defined as the rate of surgical resection, and RTV as contrast-enhancing RTV (CE-RTV) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) RTV. A threshold of EOR and RTV was recorded using increments of 2 % and 1 cm(3).
EOR and RTV were the only clinical variables influencing PFS and OS. The EOR cut-off value for conditioning survival was 76 %. For EOR ≥76 % or <76 %, the 5- to 10-year PFS was 57 % and 18 % versus 0 % (p = 0.03), and 5- to 10-year OS was 68 % and 42 % versus 0 % (p = 0.06), respectively. Additionally, the RTV cut-off value was 3 cm(3); for RTV <3 cm(3) or >3 cm(3), 5- to 10-year PFS was 64.3 % and 48.2 % versus 42 % and 0 % (p = 0.02), and 5- to 10-year OS was 66.8 % and 33.4 % versus 56 % and 0 % (p = 0.3), respectively. RTV was a more significant parameter conditioning PFS and OS than EOR (p = 0.04), and the presence of CE-RTV was an unfavorable prognostic factor compared with FLAIR-RTV.
In heterogeneous lesions from a radiological point of view as WHO grade III gliomas if a complete removal is not possible, it would be advisable to maximize the removal of enhancing areas, possibly with an EOR >76 % and an RTV <3 cm(3).
目前三级胶质瘤的治疗方法包括手术、放疗和化疗。手术切除实体瘤的价值仍是一个悬而未决的问题。本评估的目的是分析切除范围(EOR)和残余肿瘤体积(RTV)对新诊断的三级胶质瘤患者无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的影响。
本评估共纳入136例患者。所有患者均通过术后容积磁共振成像确定EOR和RTV,EOR定义为手术切除率,RTV定义为增强RTV(CE-RTV)和液体衰减反转恢复(FLAIR)RTV。使用2%和1 cm³的增量记录EOR和RTV的阈值。
EOR和RTV是影响PFS和OS的唯一临床变量。决定生存的EOR临界值为76%。对于EOR≥76%或<76%,5至10年的PFS分别为57%和18%,而<76%组为0%(p = 0.03);5至10年的OS分别为68%和42%,而<76%组为0%(p = 0.06)。此外,RTV临界值为3 cm³;对于RTV<3 cm³或>3 cm³,5至10年的PFS分别为64.3%和48.2%,而>3 cm³组为42%和0%(p = 0.02);5至10年的OS分别为66.8%和33.4%,而>3 cm³组为56%和0%(p = 0.3)。RTV是决定PFS和OS比EOR更显著的参数(p = 0.04),与FLAIR-RTV相比,CE-RTV的存在是一个不利的预后因素。
从放射学角度来看,对于WHO三级胶质瘤这种异质性病变,如果无法完全切除,建议尽可能多地切除强化区域,可能的EOR>76%且RTV<3 cm³。