• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型单孔阑尾切除术模型的疗效与安全性:猪实验研究

Efficacy and safety of a new single-port model for appendectomy: Experimental study on swine.

作者信息

Olijnyk José Gustavo, Ferreira Paulo Walter, Nácul Miguel Prestes, Cavazzola Leandro Totti

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Post Graduation Program in Surgical Sciences, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Department of Education and Research (IEP), Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

Engineering Division, Nacional Service of Industrial Learning, (SENAI-RS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):129-34. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.158951.

DOI:10.4103/0972-9941.158951
PMID:27073304
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4810945/
Abstract

CONTEXT

With the cooperation of surgeons and the engineering division of the company Bhio supply(©) (Esteio-RS, Brazil), a permanent single port was developed.

AIMS

An experimental study assessed the safety and efficacy of the device using a swine laparoscopic appendectomy model (right salpingo-oophorectomy).

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Experimental randomised study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 20 pigs were randomised for the conventional laparoscopic (CL) three-trocar technique or the single Centry port (CPort) with two working channels, aided by a transparietal thread. Operative times, surgical complications, CO2 use, and pneumoperitoneal pressure were checked. Pressure and chromopertubation tests assessed the ligatures.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

For quantitative outcomes, the Fisher's exact test analysed the samples to compare the surgeons in each group, the ANOVA test for parametric data (volume and pressure) and the Student's t-test for analysis of the fascial incision length. The binaries and isolated occurrence events were described in percentages.

RESULTS

For all cases, pneumoperitoneum was maintained. The CPort group, however, resulted in higher CO2 use (26.18 l; standard deviation [SD] ± 11.09) than CL group (5.69 l; SD ± 2.44) (P < 0.01). The mean pressure in CPort group (6.604 mmHg, SD ± 1.793) was comparatively lower than in CL group (7.382 mmHg, SD ± 1.833) (P = 0.363). There was no statistical difference between operative times, ligature safety or adverse surgical events between the different groups and surgeons.

CONCLUSION

The surgical technique used with the single port showed no differences in safety and efficacy. Though it does require more CO2 use, its working dynamics did not lead to increased operative times. The results were similar between the two surgeons in the study, suggesting that they can be reproduced.

摘要

背景

在外科医生与巴西Bhio supply公司(位于南里奥格兰德州埃斯泰约)的工程部门合作下,研发出了一种永久性单孔装置。

目的

一项实验研究使用猪腹腔镜阑尾切除术模型(右侧输卵管卵巢切除术)评估了该装置的安全性和有效性。

设置与设计

实验性随机研究。

材料与方法

总共20头猪被随机分配接受传统腹腔镜三孔技术或带有两个工作通道的单孔Centry端口(CPort),并借助经腹壁缝线辅助。检查手术时间、手术并发症、二氧化碳使用量和气腹压力。通过压力和染色输卵管通畅试验评估结扎情况。

所用统计分析方法

对于定量结果,采用Fisher精确检验分析样本以比较每组中的外科医生,采用方差分析检验参数数据(体积和压力),采用学生t检验分析筋膜切口长度。二元和孤立发生事件以百分比描述。

结果

所有病例均维持气腹状态。然而,CPort组的二氧化碳使用量(26.18升;标准差[SD]±11.09)高于传统腹腔镜组(CL组,5.69升;SD±2.44)(P<0.01)。CPort组的平均压力(6.604 mmHg,SD±1.793)相对低于CL组(7.382 mmHg,SD±1.833)(P = 0.363)。不同组和外科医生之间在手术时间、结扎安全性或不良手术事件方面无统计学差异。

结论

使用单孔的手术技术在安全性和有效性方面无差异。尽管确实需要更多的二氧化碳使用量,但其工作动态并未导致手术时间增加。研究中的两位外科医生得到的结果相似,表明这些结果可以重现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6c/4810945/6e05f4961cce/JMAS-12-129-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6c/4810945/6282898444c8/JMAS-12-129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6c/4810945/dd3aa71ba18f/JMAS-12-129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6c/4810945/6e05f4961cce/JMAS-12-129-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6c/4810945/6282898444c8/JMAS-12-129-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6c/4810945/dd3aa71ba18f/JMAS-12-129-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1c6c/4810945/6e05f4961cce/JMAS-12-129-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of a new single-port model for appendectomy: Experimental study on swine.一种新型单孔阑尾切除术模型的疗效与安全性:猪实验研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):129-34. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.158951.
2
Conventional laparoscopic appendectomy versus double-incision, three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: A 1-year randomized controlled trial.传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术与双切口三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:一项为期1年的随机对照试验。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2018 Nov;11(4):366-372. doi: 10.1111/ases.12467. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
3
Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy: minimizing the minimally invasive approach.两孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:将微创方法的创伤降至最低。
J Surg Res. 2009 May 1;153(1):167-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2008.02.003. Epub 2008 Mar 13.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy versus conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for appendicitis: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎:随机对照试验的最新荟萃分析
Surg Today. 2015 Sep;45(9):1179-86. doi: 10.1007/s00595-014-1094-y. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
5
Comparative study between single-incision and three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a prospective randomized trial.单切口与三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较研究:一项前瞻性随机试验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 May;23(5):431-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0284. Epub 2013 Mar 8.
6
Single incision laparoscopic appendicectomy versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendicectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2016 Nov;35:120-128. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.09.087. Epub 2016 Oct 2.
7
Single-Incision Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.单切口与三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:短期和长期结果
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Aug;27(8):804-811. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0406. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
8
Prospective, randomized comparative study between single-port laparoscopic appendectomy and conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究
Cir Esp. 2014 Aug-Sep;92(7):472-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2013.12.013. Epub 2014 Feb 26.
9
A prospective, randomized controlled trial of single-incision laparoscopic vs conventional 3-port laparoscopic appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis.前瞻性、随机对照试验比较单切口腹腔镜与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的效果。
J Am Coll Surg. 2014 May;218(5):950-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.12.052. Epub 2014 Feb 19.
10
Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy conducted intracorporeally with the aid of a transabdominal sling suture.经腹吊带缝线辅助下的单孔腹腔镜体内阑尾切除术。
J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Jun;42(6):1071-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2007.01.065.

本文引用的文献

1
Two-port laparoscopic appendectomy as transition to laparoendoscopic single site surgery.两孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术作为向单孔腹腔镜手术的过渡
J Minim Access Surg. 2014 Jan;10(1):23-6. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.124460.
2
Meta-analysis of randomized trials on single-incision laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.单切口腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术随机试验的荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2014 Apr;207(4):613-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.07.045. Epub 2013 Nov 9.
3
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
单孔与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Feb;18(2):426-36. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2328-9. Epub 2013 Sep 4.
4
Single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy vs conventional laparoscopic appendectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 21;19(31):5165-73. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i31.5165.
5
Comparison between single-incision and conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a meta-analysis from eight RCTs.单切口与传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的比较:八项 RCT 的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Oct;28(10):1319-27. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1726-5. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
6
Learning curve of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy for noncomplicated acute appendicitis: a preliminary analysis compared with conventional laparoscopic appendectomy.非复杂性急性阑尾炎单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术的学习曲线:与传统腹腔镜阑尾切除术的初步分析比较
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2013 May;23(5):441-6. doi: 10.1089/lap.2012.0265. Epub 2013 Mar 21.
7
Minilaparoscopic technique for inguinal hernia repair combining transabdominal pre-peritoneal and totally extraperitoneal approaches.结合经腹腹膜前和完全腹膜外入路的微型腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补技术。
JSLS. 2012 Oct-Dec;16(4):569-75. doi: 10.4293/108680812X13462882737096.
8
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) vs. conventional multiport cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)与传统多孔胆囊切除术的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2012 May;26(5):1205-13. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2051-0. Epub 2011 Dec 16.
9
Minimally invasive single-site surgery for the digestive system: A technological review.消化系统的微创单孔手术:技术综述。
J Minim Access Surg. 2011 Jan;7(1):40-51. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.72381.
10
Single-incision laparoscopic surgery - current status and controversies.单孔腹腔镜手术——现状与争议
J Minim Access Surg. 2011 Jan;7(1):6-16. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.72360.