Suppr超能文献

单切口与三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术:短期和长期结果

Single-Incision Versus Three-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy: Short- and Long-Term Outcomes.

作者信息

Vellei Samatha, Borri Alessandro

机构信息

1 Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence , Florence, Italy .

2 Department of Emergency and Accident, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi (AOUC) , Florence, Italy .

出版信息

J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Aug;27(8):804-811. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0406. Epub 2017 Apr 12.

Abstract

AIM

To compare the outcome of patients who had undergone single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) with others who had undergone three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (3-PORT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from all adults with uncomplicated appendicitis treated by laparoscopic appendectomy between June 2012 and December 2015 were prospectively collected. Patients with chronic pain, appendix malignancy, at least two previous laparotomies, and those undergoing concomitant surgery for different condition were excluded from analysis. Postoperative pain was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were reviewed postoperatively at 7 days and 1 month in the outpatient clinic. Late complications were assessed with a telephonic interview.

RESULTS

A total of 91 patients were included (46 SILA; 45 3-PORT). There were 16 males and 30 females in the SILA group (mean age = 26.76 ± 10.58 years) and 18 males and 27 females in the 3-PORT group (mean age = 26.84 ± 10.79 years). The mean operative time for SILA was 48.54 ± 12.80 min, for the 3-PORT group the mean operative time was 46.33 ± 15.54 min (P = 0.46). No case required conversion. Mean postoperative hospital length of stay was 1.87 ± 0.69 days for SILA and 2.38 ± 1.11 days for 3-PORT (P = 0.01). VAS value of 3.91 ± 1.96 and mean ketorolac usage of 0.38 ± 0.65 in 3-PORT group and SILA patients reported 3.70 ± 1.58 and 0.39 ± 0.58, respectively (P = 0.91). Our mean follow-up in SILA group was 25.75 ± 10.82 months, for 3-PORT group the mean follow-up was 26.9 ± 11.8 months. Eleven patients missed long-term follow-up. No incisional hernia was found. There is a statistically significant difference in cosmetic evaluation in favor of SILA (P < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in operative time, early complications, postoperative pain, analgesia requirement between SILA and 3-PORT laparoscopic appendectomy, but after SILA procedure discharge was quicker and long-term cosmetic satisfaction was superior.

摘要

目的

比较接受单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA)的患者与接受三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(3-PORT)的患者的治疗结果。

材料与方法

前瞻性收集2012年6月至2015年12月期间所有接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗的无并发症阑尾炎成年患者的数据。排除有慢性疼痛、阑尾恶性肿瘤、既往至少两次开腹手术以及因不同病情接受同期手术的患者。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术后疼痛。患者术后7天和1个月在门诊接受复查。通过电话访谈评估远期并发症。

结果

共纳入91例患者(46例行SILA;45例行3-PORT)。SILA组有16例男性和30例女性(平均年龄=26.76±10.58岁),3-PORT组有18例男性和27例女性(平均年龄=26.84±10.79岁)。SILA的平均手术时间为48.54±12.80分钟,3-PORT组的平均手术时间为46.33±15.54分钟(P=0.46)。无一例需要中转手术。SILA术后平均住院时间为1.87±0.69天,3-PORT为2.38±1.11天(P=0.01)。3-PORT组VAS值为3.91±1.96,酮咯酸平均用量为0.38±0.65,SILA患者分别为3.70±1.58和0.39±0.58(P=0.91)。SILA组平均随访时间为25.75±10.82个月,3-PORT组平均随访时间为26.9±11.8个月。11例患者未进行长期随访。未发现切口疝。在美容评价方面,SILA具有统计学显著优势(P<0.005)。

结论

SILA与3-PORT腹腔镜阑尾切除术在手术时间、早期并发症、术后疼痛、镇痛需求方面无差异,但SILA术后出院更快,长期美容满意度更高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验