Vellei Samatha, Borri Alessandro
1 Department of Surgery and Translational Medicine, University of Florence , Florence, Italy .
2 Department of Emergency and Accident, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi (AOUC) , Florence, Italy .
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Aug;27(8):804-811. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0406. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
To compare the outcome of patients who had undergone single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy (SILA) with others who had undergone three-port laparoscopic appendectomy (3-PORT).
Data from all adults with uncomplicated appendicitis treated by laparoscopic appendectomy between June 2012 and December 2015 were prospectively collected. Patients with chronic pain, appendix malignancy, at least two previous laparotomies, and those undergoing concomitant surgery for different condition were excluded from analysis. Postoperative pain was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were reviewed postoperatively at 7 days and 1 month in the outpatient clinic. Late complications were assessed with a telephonic interview.
A total of 91 patients were included (46 SILA; 45 3-PORT). There were 16 males and 30 females in the SILA group (mean age = 26.76 ± 10.58 years) and 18 males and 27 females in the 3-PORT group (mean age = 26.84 ± 10.79 years). The mean operative time for SILA was 48.54 ± 12.80 min, for the 3-PORT group the mean operative time was 46.33 ± 15.54 min (P = 0.46). No case required conversion. Mean postoperative hospital length of stay was 1.87 ± 0.69 days for SILA and 2.38 ± 1.11 days for 3-PORT (P = 0.01). VAS value of 3.91 ± 1.96 and mean ketorolac usage of 0.38 ± 0.65 in 3-PORT group and SILA patients reported 3.70 ± 1.58 and 0.39 ± 0.58, respectively (P = 0.91). Our mean follow-up in SILA group was 25.75 ± 10.82 months, for 3-PORT group the mean follow-up was 26.9 ± 11.8 months. Eleven patients missed long-term follow-up. No incisional hernia was found. There is a statistically significant difference in cosmetic evaluation in favor of SILA (P < 0.005).
There was no difference in operative time, early complications, postoperative pain, analgesia requirement between SILA and 3-PORT laparoscopic appendectomy, but after SILA procedure discharge was quicker and long-term cosmetic satisfaction was superior.
比较接受单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(SILA)的患者与接受三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术(3-PORT)的患者的治疗结果。
前瞻性收集2012年6月至2015年12月期间所有接受腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗的无并发症阑尾炎成年患者的数据。排除有慢性疼痛、阑尾恶性肿瘤、既往至少两次开腹手术以及因不同病情接受同期手术的患者。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估术后疼痛。患者术后7天和1个月在门诊接受复查。通过电话访谈评估远期并发症。
共纳入91例患者(46例行SILA;45例行3-PORT)。SILA组有16例男性和30例女性(平均年龄=26.76±10.58岁),3-PORT组有18例男性和27例女性(平均年龄=26.84±10.79岁)。SILA的平均手术时间为48.54±12.80分钟,3-PORT组的平均手术时间为46.33±15.54分钟(P=0.46)。无一例需要中转手术。SILA术后平均住院时间为1.87±0.69天,3-PORT为2.38±1.11天(P=0.01)。3-PORT组VAS值为3.91±1.96,酮咯酸平均用量为0.38±0.65,SILA患者分别为3.70±1.58和0.39±0.58(P=0.91)。SILA组平均随访时间为25.75±10.82个月,3-PORT组平均随访时间为26.9±11.8个月。11例患者未进行长期随访。未发现切口疝。在美容评价方面,SILA具有统计学显著优势(P<0.005)。
SILA与3-PORT腹腔镜阑尾切除术在手术时间、早期并发症、术后疼痛、镇痛需求方面无差异,但SILA术后出院更快,长期美容满意度更高。