• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿嵌顿性腹股沟疝经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与传统修补术的对比研究

A comparative study on trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic approach versus conventional repair for incarcerated inguinal hernia in children.

作者信息

Jun Zhang, Juntao Ge, Shuli Liu, Li Long

机构信息

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, People's Republic of China.

Department of Pediatric Surgery, Capital Institute of Pediatrics, Beijing, People's Republic of China; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Qianfo Hill Hospital, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):139-42. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.169953.

DOI:10.4103/0972-9941.169953
PMID:27073306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4810947/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine whether singleport laparoscopic repair (SLR) for incarcerated inguinal hernia in children is superior toconventional repair (CR) approaches.

METHOD

Between March 2013 and September 2013, 126 infants and children treatedwere retrospectively reviewed. All the patients were divided into three groups. Group A (48 patients) underwent trans-umbilical SLR, group B (36 patients) was subjected to trans-umbilical conventional two-port laparoscopic repair (TLR) while the conventional open surgery repair (COR) was performed in group C (42 patients). Data regarding the operating time, bleeding volume, post-operative hydrocele formation, testicular atrophy, cosmetic results, recurrence rate, and duration of hospital stay of the patients were collected.

RESULT

All the cases were completed successfully without conversion. The mean operative time for group A was 15 ± 3.9 min and 24 ± 7.2 min for unilateral hernia and bilateral hernia respectively, whereas for group B, it was 13 ± 6.7 min and 23 ± 9.2 min. The mean duration of surgery in group C was 35 ± 5.2 min for unilateral hernia. The recurrence rate was 0% in all the three groups. There were statistically significant differences in theoperating time, bleeding volume, post-operative hydrocele formation, cosmetic results and duration hospital stay between the three groups (P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences between SLR and TLR were observed except the more cosmetic result in SLR.

CONCLUSION

SLR is safe and effective, minimally invasive, and is a new technology worth promoting.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定儿童嵌顿性腹股沟疝的单孔腹腔镜修补术(SLR)是否优于传统修补术(CR)。

方法

回顾性分析2013年3月至2013年9月期间接受治疗的126例婴幼儿及儿童。所有患者分为三组。A组(48例)接受经脐单孔腹腔镜修补术,B组(36例)接受经脐传统两孔腹腔镜修补术(TLR),而C组(42例)进行传统开放手术修补术(COR)。收集患者的手术时间、出血量、术后鞘膜积液形成、睾丸萎缩、美容效果、复发率及住院时间等数据。

结果

所有病例均成功完成,无中转情况。A组单侧疝平均手术时间为15±3.9分钟,双侧疝为24±7.2分钟;B组单侧疝平均手术时间为13±6.7分钟,双侧疝为23±9.2分钟。C组单侧疝平均手术时间为35±5.2分钟。三组复发率均为0%。三组在手术时间、出血量、术后鞘膜积液形成、美容效果及住院时间方面存在统计学显著差异(P<0.001)。除SLR美容效果更佳外,SLR与TLR之间未观察到统计学显著差异。

结论

单孔腹腔镜修补术安全有效、微创,是一项值得推广的新技术。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9573/4810947/2fd1e9633d5f/JMAS-12-139-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9573/4810947/545041a26274/JMAS-12-139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9573/4810947/576e1815f307/JMAS-12-139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9573/4810947/8117dffa0b75/JMAS-12-139-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9573/4810947/2fd1e9633d5f/JMAS-12-139-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9573/4810947/545041a26274/JMAS-12-139-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9573/4810947/576e1815f307/JMAS-12-139-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9573/4810947/8117dffa0b75/JMAS-12-139-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9573/4810947/2fd1e9633d5f/JMAS-12-139-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
A comparative study on trans-umbilical single-port laparoscopic approach versus conventional repair for incarcerated inguinal hernia in children.小儿嵌顿性腹股沟疝经脐单孔腹腔镜手术与传统修补术的对比研究
J Minim Access Surg. 2016 Apr-Jun;12(2):139-42. doi: 10.4103/0972-9941.169953.
2
Surgical outcome of laparoscopic and open surgery of pediatric inguinal hernia.小儿腹股沟疝腹腔镜手术与开放手术的手术结果
Mymensingh Med J. 2013 Apr;22(2):232-6.
3
Does the laparoscopic treatment of paediatric hydroceles represent a better alternative to the traditional open repair technique? A retrospective study of 1332 surgeries performed at two centres in China.腹腔镜治疗小儿鞘膜积液是否是传统开放修复技术的更好替代方案?对中国两个中心进行的1332例手术的回顾性研究。
Hernia. 2018 Aug;22(4):661-669. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1715-7. Epub 2017 Dec 14.
4
Fifteen Years Experience with Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair in Infants and Children.婴儿和儿童腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术的十五年经验
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2018 Jan;28(1):101-105. doi: 10.1089/lap.2017.0269. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
5
The Burnia: Laparoscopic Sutureless Inguinal Hernia Repair in Girls.布尔尼亚法:女童腹腔镜无缝合腹股沟疝修补术
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2017 Apr;27(4):430-433. doi: 10.1089/lap.2016.0234. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
6
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair by modified peritoneal leaflet closure: Description and initial results in children.改良腹膜瓣关闭法腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术:儿童中的描述和初步结果。
J Pediatr Urol. 2018 Jun;14(3):272.e1-272.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.02.015. Epub 2018 Mar 13.
7
Laparoscopic percutaneous inguinal hernia repair in children: review of technique and comparison with open surgery.小儿腹腔镜经皮腹股沟疝修补术:技术回顾及与开放手术的比较
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Oct;11(5):262.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2015.04.008. Epub 2015 May 13.
8
Laparoscopic Hernia Repair versus Open Herniotomy in Children: A Controlled Randomized Study.儿童腹腔镜疝修补术与开放性疝切开术的对照随机研究
Minim Invasive Surg. 2012;2012:484135. doi: 10.1155/2012/484135. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
9
Single-port versus conventional laparoscopic total extra-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial.单孔与传统腹腔镜完全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术:一项前瞻性、随机、对照临床试验。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1356-63. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4378-4. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
10
To use a simple hernia needle for single-port laparoscopic percutaneous inguinal hernia repair in children: a 5-year experience study.使用简易疝针行单孔腹腔镜经皮小儿腹股沟疝修补术:一项5年经验研究
Front Pediatr. 2024 Jan 8;11:1298643. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1298643. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of laparoscopic treatment of pediatric inguinal hernia: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜治疗小儿腹股沟疝的临床疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Oct 15;16(10):5155-5167. doi: 10.62347/VGGJ1398. eCollection 2024.
2
Ultra-micro instrument in laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) hernioplasty.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)中的超微器械。
Updates Surg. 2024 Apr;76(2):601-605. doi: 10.1007/s13304-023-01715-0. Epub 2023 Dec 12.
3
Transumbilical Single-Site Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Closure of the Internal Inguinal Ring for Pediatric Inguinal Hernia.

本文引用的文献

1
[The surgical strategy for laparoscopic approach in recurrent inguinal hernia repair: 213 cases report].[腹腔镜入路在复发性腹股沟疝修补术中的手术策略:213例报告]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;51(9):792-5.
2
A single-blinded, randomized comparison of laparoscopic versus open bilateral hernia repair in boys.男孩腹腔镜与开放性双侧疝修补术的单盲随机对照研究。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Feb;24(2):117-21. doi: 10.1089/lap.2013.0397. Epub 2013 Nov 28.
3
Single-incision laparoscopic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy using conventional instruments for children with choledochal cysts.
经脐单孔腹腔镜下小儿腹股沟疝内环口腹膜内缝合法
Front Pediatr. 2022 Mar 15;10:855537. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.855537. eCollection 2022.
4
Single-site laparoscopic high ligation of the extraperitoneal hernia sac with an epidural needle for incarcerated ovarian hernia in infants.经皮硬膜外针单点腹腔镜高位结扎腹膜外疝囊治疗婴儿嵌顿性卵巢疝
BMC Surg. 2022 Feb 23;22(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01520-3.
5
Outcomes of laparoscopic incarcerated inguinal hernia repair in children.小儿腹腔镜嵌顿性腹股沟疝修补术的疗效
J Minim Access Surg. 2020 Jan-Mar;16(1):1-4. doi: 10.4103/jmas.JMAS_84_19.
6
Laparoscopic versus open repair for inguinal hernia in children: a retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜与开放手术治疗儿童腹股沟疝:回顾性队列研究。
Surg Today. 2019 Dec;49(12):1044-1050. doi: 10.1007/s00595-019-01847-0. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
7
Trans-umbilical two-port laparoscopic suturing of the inguinal hernia defect with percutaneous assistance: a safe and efficient scarless surgery for pediatric inguinal hernia repair.经脐双孔腹腔镜腹股沟疝缺损缝合术联合经皮辅助:一种用于小儿腹股沟疝修补的安全高效无痕手术
Hernia. 2018 Aug;22(4):681-684. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1749-5. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
8
Choice of Repairing Inguinal Hernia in Children: Open Versus Laparoscopy.小儿腹股沟疝修补术选择:开放手术与腹腔镜手术。
Indian J Pediatr. 2017 Jul;84(7):555-563. doi: 10.1007/s12098-017-2354-9. Epub 2017 May 27.
经脐单部位腹腔镜下使用传统器械施行胆肠 Roux-en-Y 吻合术治疗小儿胆总管囊肿。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Jun;26(6):1784-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2110-6. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
4
Initial experience in children using conventional laparoscopic instruments in single-incision laparoscopic surgery.经脐单孔腹腔镜手术中使用传统腹腔镜器械的初步经验。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 Dec;45(12):2381-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.08.036.
5
Incarceration rates in pediatric inguinal hernia: do not trust the coding.儿童腹股沟疝的监禁率:不要相信编码。
J Pediatr Surg. 2010 May;45(5):1007-11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.02.033.
6
Appendicectomy and cholecystectomy using single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS): the first UK experience.采用单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)进行阑尾切除术和胆囊切除术:英国的首例经验。
Surg Innov. 2009 Sep;16(3):211-7. doi: 10.1177/1553350609344413. Epub 2009 Aug 31.
7
Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison.腹腔镜单部位(LESS)与标准腹腔镜左供肾切除术:配对比较。
Eur Urol. 2010 Jan;57(1):95-101. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2009.07.023. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
8
A comprehensive review of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) techniques for cholecystectomy.单孔腹腔镜手术(SILS)和经自然腔道内镜手术(NOTES)用于胆囊切除术的技术综述。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Sep;13(9):1733-40. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-0902-y. Epub 2009 May 2.
9
Pediatric inguinal hernia: laparoscopic versus open surgery.小儿腹股沟疝:腹腔镜手术与开放手术对比
JSLS. 2008 Jul-Sep;12(3):277-81.
10
Editorial comment on: Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence.关于《单孔脐部腹腔镜与传统腹腔镜肾切除术:围手术期结果及短期康复指标比较》的编辑评论
Eur Urol. 2009 May;55(5):1205. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.08.020. Epub 2008 Aug 13.