Suppr超能文献

[腹腔镜入路在复发性腹股沟疝修补术中的手术策略:213例报告]

[The surgical strategy for laparoscopic approach in recurrent inguinal hernia repair: 213 cases report].

作者信息

Chen Xin, Li Jian-Wen, Zhang Yun, Sun Jing, Zheng Min-Hua, Dong Feng

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.

Department of General Surgery, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China. Email:

出版信息

Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Sep;51(9):792-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the surgical strategy for laparoscopic approach in recurrent inguinal hernia repair.

METHODS

Between January 2001 and December 2011, the clinical data of 213 patients with 225 recurrent inguinal hernias underwent laparoscopic repair were retrospectively analyzed. There were 202 male and 11 female patients and their average age were (67 ± 14) years old (range 22-97 years old). The surgical methods included laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair (TAPP, n = 174), total extraperitoneal herniorrhaphy (TEP, n = 41) and intraperitoneal onlay mesh (IPOM, n = 10). The follow-up period ranged from 15 to 60 months (median 42 months). No patient lost to follow-up during the investigation.

RESULTS

The 48 TAPP and 26 TEP were applied to 77 (32.9%) recurrent hernias after conventional suture repair; 23 TAPP and 15 TEP were utilized to 38 (16.9%) recurrent hernias after Lichtenstein repair; 90 TAPP and 1 IPOM were employed for 91 (40.4%) recurrent hernias after Patch and Plug repair; and the other 22 (9.8%) recurrent hernias after preperitoneal repair were repaired by using 13 TAPP and 9 IPOM techniques. No conversion to open surgery was observed. The average operative time was (39 ± 14) minutes (range 15-90 minutes). No patients required analgesia postoperatively. The postoperative average VAS score was 2.4 ± 1.1 (range 1.2-6.4). The average hospital stay was (1.7 ± 1.5) days (range 1-9 days), and the patients returned to unrestricted activities in 2 weeks was 99.6% (212 cases). No recurrence was observed during the follow-up. The accumulative postoperative complications rates was 11.1% (25 cases), with 1 severe complication (surgical intervention was needed) as intraabdominal infection (0.4%), as well as other 24 complications including 15 cases of seroma (6.7%), 5 cases of urinary retention (2.2%), 3 cases with transient paresthesia (1.3%) and 1 case with paralytic ileus (0.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

TAPP and TEP are both feasible and efficacious techniques to treat recurrent hernias after suture repair and Lichtenstein repair, while the choice depends on surgeons' experience. Most recurrent hernias after Patch and Plug repair could be treated successfully by TAPP but TEP technique is not encouraged. For recurrences after preperitoneal repair, the TAPP repair should be recommended as first choice, while IPOM is a good technique to cope with the cases which TAPP failed.

摘要

目的

评估腹腔镜手术治疗复发性腹股沟疝的手术策略。

方法

回顾性分析2001年1月至2011年12月期间213例225侧接受腹腔镜修补的复发性腹股沟疝患者的临床资料。其中男性202例,女性11例,平均年龄(67±14)岁(范围22 - 97岁)。手术方法包括腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP,n = 174)、完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP,n = 41)和腹腔内补片植入修补术(IPOM,n = 10)。随访时间为15至60个月(中位时间42个月)。调查期间无患者失访。

结果

48例TAPP和26例TEP用于77侧(32.9%)传统缝合修补术后的复发性疝;23例TAPP和15例TEP用于38侧(16.9%)Lichtenstein修补术后的复发性疝;90例TAPP和1例IPOM用于91侧(40.4%)补片修补术后的复发性疝;另外22侧(9.8%)腹膜前修补术后的复发性疝采用13例TAPP和9例IPOM技术修补。未观察到中转开放手术的情况。平均手术时间为(39±14)分钟(范围15 - 90分钟)。术后无患者需要镇痛。术后平均视觉模拟评分(VAS)为2.4±1.1(范围1.2 - 6.4)。平均住院时间为(1.7±1.5)天(范围1 - 9天),99.6%(212例)患者在2周内恢复正常活动。随访期间未观察到复发情况。术后累积并发症发生率为11.1%(25例),其中严重并发症1例(需要手术干预)为腹腔内感染(0.4%),其他24例并发症包括15例血清肿(6.7%)、5例尿潴留(2.2%)、3例短暂性感觉异常(1.3%)和1例麻痹性肠梗阻(0.4%)。

结论

TAPP和TEP对于缝合修补和Lichtenstein修补术后的复发性疝均是可行且有效的技术,具体选择取决于外科医生的经验。补片修补术后的大多数复发性疝可通过TAPP成功治疗,但不鼓励使用TEP技术。对于腹膜前修补术后的复发疝,应首选TAPP修补,而IPOM是处理TAPP失败病例的良好技术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验