口吃成年人与非口吃成年人不同言语任务的比较。
Comparison of different speech tasks among adults who stutter and adults who do not stutter.
作者信息
Ritto Ana Paula, Costa Julia Biancalana, Juste Fabiola Staróbole, Andrade Claudia Regina Furquim de
机构信息
Departamento de Fisioterapia, Fonoaudiologia e Terapia Ocupacional, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo/SP, Brazil.
出版信息
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2016 Mar;71(3):152-5. doi: 10.6061/clinics/2016(03)06.
OBJECTIVES
In this study, we compared the performance of both fluent speakers and people who stutter in three different speaking situations: monologue speech, oral reading and choral reading. This study follows the assumption that the neuromotor control of speech can be influenced by external auditory stimuli in both speakers who stutter and speakers who do not stutter.
METHOD
Seventeen adults who stutter and seventeen adults who do not stutter were assessed in three speaking tasks: monologue, oral reading (solo reading aloud) and choral reading (reading in unison with the evaluator). Speech fluency and rate were measured for each task.
RESULTS
The participants who stuttered had a lower frequency of stuttering during choral reading than during monologue and oral reading.
CONCLUSIONS
According to the dual premotor system model, choral speech enhanced fluency by providing external cues for the timing of each syllable compensating for deficient internal cues.
目的
在本研究中，我们比较了流利说话者和口吃者在三种不同说话情境下的表现：独白演讲、朗读和齐声朗读。本研究基于这样一种假设，即口吃者和非口吃者的言语神经运动控制都可能受到外部听觉刺激的影响。
方法
对17名口吃成年人和17名非口吃成年人进行了三项言语任务评估：独白、朗读（大声独自朗读）和齐声朗读（与评估者齐声朗读）。测量了每项任务的言语流畅性和语速。
结果
口吃参与者在齐声朗读时的口吃频率低于独白和朗读时。
结论
根据双重前运动系统模型，齐声朗读通过为每个音节的时间提供外部线索来补偿内部线索不足，从而提高了流畅性。
Zotero 插件