Buehler Tania, Bally Lia, Dokumaci Ayse Sila, Stettler Christoph, Boesch Chris
Department of Clinical Research and Department of Radiology, University of Bern, Switzerland.
Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, Inselspital Bern, Switzerland.
NMR Biomed. 2016 Jun;29(6):796-805. doi: 10.1002/nbm.3531. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
Glycogen is a major substrate in energy metabolism and particularly important to prevent hypoglycemia in pathologies of glucose homeostasis such as type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM). (13) C-MRS is increasingly used to determine glycogen in skeletal muscle and liver non-invasively; however, the low signal-to-noise ratio leads to long acquisition times, particularly when glycogen levels are determined before and after interventions. In order to ease the requirements for the subjects and to avoid systematic effects of the lengthy examination, we evaluated if a standardized preparation period would allow us to shift the baseline (pre-intervention) experiments to a preceding day. Based on natural abundance (13) C-MRS on a clinical 3 T MR system the present study investigated the test-retest reliability of glycogen measurements in patients with T1DM and matched controls (n = 10 each group) in quadriceps muscle and liver. Prior to the MR examination, participants followed a standardized diet and avoided strenuous exercise for two days. The average coefficient of variation (CV) of myocellular glycogen levels was 9.7% in patients with T1DM compared with 6.6% in controls after a 2 week period, while hepatic glycogen variability was 13.3% in patients with T1DM and 14.6% in controls. For comparison, a single-session test-retest variability in four healthy volunteers resulted in 9.5% for skeletal muscle and 14.3% for liver. Glycogen levels in muscle and liver were not statistically different between test and retest, except for hepatic glycogen, which decreased in T1DM patients in the retest examination, but without an increase of the group distribution. Since the CVs of glycogen levels determined in a "single session" versus "within weeks" are comparable, we conclude that the major source of uncertainty is the methodological error and that physiological variations can be minimized by a pre-study standardization. For hepatic glycogen examinations, familiarization sessions (MR and potentially strenuous interventions) are recommended. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
糖原是能量代谢中的主要底物,对于预防葡萄糖稳态异常疾病(如1型糖尿病,T1DM)中的低血糖尤为重要。(13)碳磁共振波谱(C-MRS)越来越多地用于无创测定骨骼肌和肝脏中的糖原;然而,低信噪比导致采集时间长,特别是在干预前后测定糖原水平时。为了减轻对受试者的要求并避免长时间检查的系统影响,我们评估了标准化准备期是否能让我们将基线(干预前)实验转移到前一天。基于临床3T磁共振系统上的自然丰度(13)C-MRS,本研究调查了T1DM患者和匹配对照组(每组n = 10)股四头肌和肝脏中糖原测量的重测信度。在磁共振检查前,参与者遵循标准化饮食并避免剧烈运动两天。2周后,T1DM患者肌细胞糖原水平的平均变异系数(CV)为9.7%,而对照组为6.6%,T1DM患者肝脏糖原变异性为13.3%,对照组为14.6%。作为比较,四名健康志愿者单次测试-重测的变异性结果为骨骼肌9.5%,肝脏14.3%。除肝脏糖原外,测试和重测之间肌肉和肝脏中的糖原水平无统计学差异,肝脏糖原在重测检查中T1DM患者有所下降,但组内分布没有增加。由于“单次”与“数周内”测定的糖原水平CV具有可比性,我们得出结论,不确定性的主要来源是方法误差,并且生理变异可通过研究前标准化降至最低。对于肝脏糖原检查,建议进行熟悉阶段(磁共振及可能的剧烈干预)。版权所有© 2016约翰威立父子有限公司。