School of Exercise Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Br J Sports Med. 2016 Aug;50(15):909-20. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2015-095311. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
To systematically review the evidence base related to hamstring strength and flexibility in previously injured hamstrings.
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
A systematic literature search was conducted of PubMed, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and EMBASE from inception to August 2015.
Full-text English articles which included studies which assessed at least one measure of hamstring strength or flexibility in men and women with prior hamstring strain injury within 24 months of the testing date.
Twenty-eight studies were included in the review. Previously injured legs demonstrated deficits across several variables. Lower isometric strength was found <7 days postinjury (d=-1.72), but this did not persist beyond 7 days after injury. The passive straight leg raise was restricted at multiple time points after injury (<10 days, d=-1.12; 10-20 days, d=-0.74; 20-30 days, d=-0.40), but not after 40-50 days postinjury. Deficits remained after return to play in isokinetically measured concentric (60°/s, d=-0.33) and Nordic eccentric knee flexor strength (d=-0.39). The conventional hamstring to quadricep strength ratios were also reduced well after return to play (60:60°/s, d=-0.32; 240:240°/s, d=-0.43) and functional (30:240°/s, d=-0.88), but these effects were inconsistent across measurement methods.
After hamstring strain, acute isometric and passive straight leg raise deficits resolve within 20-50 days. Deficits in eccentric and concentric strength and strength ratios persist after return to play, but this effect was inconsistent across measurement methods. Flexibility and isometric strength should be monitored throughout rehabilitation, but dynamic strength should be assessed at and following return to play.
系统回顾与既往腘绳肌损伤相关的腘绳肌力量和柔韧性的证据基础。
系统综述和荟萃分析。
从创建至 2015 年 8 月,对 PubMed、CINAHL、SPORTDiscus、Cochrane 图书馆、Web of Science 和 EMBASE 进行了系统的文献检索。
全文为英文的研究,这些研究评估了 24 个月内发生过腘绳肌拉伤的男性和女性的至少一项腘绳肌力量或柔韧性测量值。
综述纳入了 28 项研究。既往损伤的肢体在多个变量上表现出缺陷。受伤后 7 天内发现等长力量降低(d=-1.72),但在受伤后 7 天以上并未持续。被动直腿抬高在受伤后多个时间点受限(<10 天,d=-1.12;10-20 天,d=-0.74;20-30 天,d=-0.40),但在 40-50 天后不受限。在重返运动时,等速测量的向心(60°/s,d=-0.33)和北欧离心膝屈肌力量(d=-0.39)仍存在缺陷。常规的腘绳肌与股四头肌力量比值在重返运动后也明显降低(60:60°/s,d=-0.32;240:240°/s,d=-0.43)和功能(30:240°/s,d=-0.88),但这些影响在不同的测量方法之间并不一致。
在腘绳肌拉伤后,急性等长和被动直腿抬高的缺陷在 20-50 天内得到解决。在重返运动后,离心和向心力量以及力量比值的缺陷持续存在,但这种影响在不同的测量方法之间并不一致。在康复过程中应监测柔韧性和等长力量,但在重返运动时和之后应评估动态力量。