Tumor Biology Section, Head and Neck Surgery Branch, National Institutes of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri.
Cancer Immunol Res. 2016 Jul;4(7):611-20. doi: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-15-0252. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
Significant subsets of patients with oral cancer fail to respond to single-agent programmed death (PD) blockade. Syngeneic models of oral cancer were used to determine if blocking oncogenic signaling improved in vivo responses to PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (mAb). Anti-PD-L1 enhanced durable primary tumor control and survival when combined with mTOR (rapamycin), but not in combination with MEK inhibition (PD901) in immunogenic MOC1 tumors. Conversely, PD-L1 mAb did not enhance tumor control in poorly immunogenic MOC2 tumors. Rapamycin enhanced expansion of peripheral antigen-specific CD8 T cells and IFNγ production following ex vivo antigen stimulation. More CD8 T cells infiltrated and were activated after PD-L1 mAb treatment in mice with immunogenic MOC1 tumors, which were stable or increased by the addition of rapamycin, but suppressed when PD901 was added. Rapamycin increased IFNγ production capacity in peripheral and tumor-infiltrating CD8 T cells. In vivo antibody depletion revealed a CD8 T-cell-dependent, and not NK cell-dependent mechanism of tumor growth inhibition after treatment with rapamycin and PD-L1 mAb, ruling out significant effects from NK cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Rapamycin also enhanced IFNγ or PD-L1 mAb treatment-associated induction of MHC class I expression on MOC1 tumor cells, an effect abrogated by depleting infiltrating CD8 T cells from the tumor microenvironment. These data conflict with traditional views of rapamycin as a universal immunosuppressant, and when combined with evidence of enhanced antitumor activity with the combination of rapamycin and PD-L1 mAb, suggest that this treatment combination deserves careful evaluation in the clinical setting. Cancer Immunol Res; 4(7); 611-20. ©2016 AACR.
显著部分口腔癌患者对单药程序性死亡(PD)阻断无反应。我们使用同基因口腔癌模型来确定阻断致癌信号是否能改善 PD-L1 单克隆抗体(mAb)在体内的反应。抗 PD-L1 与 mTOR(雷帕霉素)联合增强了原发性肿瘤的持久控制和存活,但与 MEK 抑制(PD901)联合在免疫原性 MOC1 肿瘤中无效。相反,PD-L1 mAb 不能增强低免疫原性 MOC2 肿瘤的肿瘤控制。雷帕霉素增强了外周抗原特异性 CD8 T 细胞的扩增和 IFNγ 的产生,在体外抗原刺激后。在具有免疫原性 MOC1 肿瘤的小鼠中,PD-L1 mAb 治疗后 CD8 T 细胞浸润和激活增加,并且在添加雷帕霉素时稳定或增加,但在添加 PD901 时被抑制。雷帕霉素增加了外周和肿瘤浸润性 CD8 T 细胞中的 IFNγ 产生能力。体内抗体耗竭显示,在用雷帕霉素和 PD-L1 mAb 治疗后,肿瘤生长抑制是一种 CD8 T 细胞依赖性而非 NK 细胞依赖性机制,排除了 NK 细胞介导的抗体依赖性细胞毒性的显著影响。雷帕霉素还增强了 IFNγ 或 PD-L1 mAb 治疗相关的 MHC Ⅰ类表达在 MOC1 肿瘤细胞上的诱导,这种效应被从肿瘤微环境中耗竭浸润性 CD8 T 细胞所消除。这些数据与雷帕霉素作为一种通用免疫抑制剂的传统观点相矛盾,并且当与雷帕霉素和 PD-L1 mAb 联合治疗的增强抗肿瘤活性的证据相结合时,表明这种治疗联合值得在临床环境中仔细评估。癌症免疫学研究; 4(7); 611-20. ©2016AACR.