• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Inflammatory Response After Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Data From the Oslo-CoMet Trial: Erratum.腹腔镜与开腹切除结直肠癌肝转移后的炎症反应：来自奥斯陆-共同研究试验的数据：勘误
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(10):e367e. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000481801.40636.7e.
2
Open versus laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (the Oslo-CoMet Study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.开放性与腹腔镜肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移（奥斯陆-结直肠癌肝转移研究）：一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Mar 4;16:73. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0577-5.
3
Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases: The OSLO-COMET Randomized Controlled Trial.腹腔镜与开腹结直肠肝转移灶切除术的比较：OSLO-COMET 随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Feb;267(2):199-207. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002353.
4
Inflammatory Response After Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Data From the Oslo-CoMet Trial.腹腔镜与开腹切除结直肠癌肝转移灶后的炎症反应：来自奥斯陆-结肠肝转移瘤试验的数据
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(42):e1786. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001786.
5
Laparoscopic versus open liver resection in the posterosuperior segments: a sub-group analysis from the OSLO-COMET randomized controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹肝后上段切除术的比较：OSLO-COMET 随机对照试验的亚组分析。
HPB (Oxford). 2019 Nov;21(11):1485-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.03.358. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
6
Response: The OSLO-COMET Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Liver Resection for Colorectal Metastases.回应：关于腹腔镜与开放肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的奥斯陆-COMET随机对照试验。
Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):e69-e70. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002646.
7
The OSLO-COMET Randomized Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases.OSLO-COMET 关于腹腔镜与开放手术切除结直肠癌肝转移瘤的随机对照试验
Ann Surg. 2018 Dec;268(6):e69. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002640.
8
Outcome of laparoscopic versus open hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的疗效
ANZ J Surg. 2013 Nov;83(11):847-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06270.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
9
The impact of laparoscopic versus open colorectal cancer surgery on subsequent laparoscopic resection of liver metastases: A multicenter study.腹腔镜与开放结直肠癌手术对后续肝转移瘤腹腔镜切除术的影响：一项多中心研究。
Surgery. 2015 Jun;157(6):1046-54. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
10
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open liver resection for colorectal liver metastases.腹腔镜与开腹肝切除术治疗结直肠癌肝转移的Meta分析
Oncotarget. 2016 Dec 20;7(51):84544-84555. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13026.

引用本文的文献

1
Anesthesia Techniques and Long-Term Oncological Outcomes.麻醉技术与长期肿瘤学结局
Front Oncol. 2021 Dec 8;11:788918. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.788918. eCollection 2021.
2
Major hepatectomy for primary hepatolithiasis: a comparative study of laparoscopic versus open treatment.原发性肝胆管结石的肝叶切除术：腹腔镜与开放治疗的对比研究。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4271-4276. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6176-2. Epub 2018 Apr 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Inflammatory Response After Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases: Data From the Oslo-CoMet Trial.腹腔镜与开腹切除结直肠癌肝转移灶后的炎症反应：来自奥斯陆-结肠肝转移瘤试验的数据
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(42):e1786. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001786.

腹腔镜与开腹切除结直肠癌肝转移后的炎症反应：来自奥斯陆-共同研究试验的数据：勘误

Inflammatory Response After Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Data From the Oslo-CoMet Trial: Erratum.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(10):e367e. doi: 10.1097/01.md.0000481801.40636.7e.

DOI:10.1097/01.md.0000481801.40636.7e
PMID:27077464
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4998925/
Abstract

In the article ''Inflammatory Response After Laparoscopic Versus Open Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases Data From the Oslo-CoMet Trial'', which appeared in Volume 94, Issue 42 of Medicine, the University of Oslo was not credited as the affiliation for several authors. The article has since been corrected online.

摘要

发表于《医学》杂志第94卷第42期的文章《腹腔镜与开放手术切除结直肠癌肝转移后的炎症反应：来自奥斯陆-共同试验的数据》中，奥斯陆大学未被列为几位作者的所属机构。该文章随后已在网上更正。