Verma Kushagra, Boniello Anthony, Rihn Jeffrey
From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, CA (Dr. Verma), the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA (Dr. Boniello), and the Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA (Dr. Rhin).
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2016 Jun;24(6):357-64. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00378.
Pedicle screw fixation is the preferred method of posterior fusion in lumbar spinal surgery. The technique provides three-column support of the vertebrae, contributing to the biomechanical strength of the construct. However, open pedicle screw fixation often necessitates wide posterior exposure and dissection with soft-tissue disruption of the facet joint. Alternative posterior fixation techniques have been developed to reduce surgical time, soft-tissue dissection, disruption of the adjacent facet joint capsule, neurologic risk, and implant cost. Results of these techniques are comparable to those of standard pedicle screw fixation systems. Certain patients, especially those at a lower risk of nonunion or those who require posterior fixation only as an adjunct to anterior column support, may benefit from the shorter surgical time and limited posterior exposure of the alternative techniques. However, the decreased rigidity of these alternative constructs can result in excessive motion, which can lead to nonunion and early hardware failure.
椎弓根螺钉固定是腰椎手术中后路融合的首选方法。该技术为椎体提供三柱支撑,有助于增强内固定结构的生物力学强度。然而,开放性椎弓根螺钉固定通常需要广泛的后路显露和解剖,同时会破坏小关节的软组织。为了减少手术时间、软组织剥离、相邻小关节囊的破坏、神经损伤风险以及植入物成本,已开发出替代的后路固定技术。这些技术的效果与标准椎弓根螺钉固定系统相当。某些患者,尤其是那些骨不连风险较低或仅需后路固定作为前柱支撑辅助手段的患者,可能会从替代技术较短的手术时间和有限的后路显露中受益。然而,这些替代内固定结构的刚度降低可能会导致过度活动,进而导致骨不连和内固定早期失效。