• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

情感感受对创造性和分析性表现的灵活影响。

A flexible influence of affective feelings on creative and analytic performance.

机构信息

Department of Psychology.

出版信息

Emotion. 2016 Sep;16(6):826-37. doi: 10.1037/emo0000188. Epub 2016 Apr 14.

DOI:10.1037/emo0000188
PMID:27078743
Abstract

Considerable research shows that positive affect improves performance on creative tasks and negative affect improves performance on analytic tasks. The present research entertained the idea that affective feelings have flexible, rather than fixed, effects on cognitive performance. Consistent with the idea that positive and negative affect signal the value of accessible processing inclinations, the influence of affective feelings on performance on analytic or creative tasks was found to be flexibly responsive to the relative accessibility of different styles of processing (i.e., heuristic vs. systematic, global vs. local). When a global processing orientation was accessible happy participants generated more creative uses for a brick (Experiment 1), successfully solved more remote associates and insight problems (Experiment 2) and displayed broader categorization (Experiment 3) than those in sad moods. When a local processing orientation was accessible this pattern reversed. When a heuristic processing style was accessible happy participants were more likely to commit the conjunction fallacy (Experiment 3) and showed less pronounced anchoring effects (Experiment 4) than sad participants. When a systematic processing style was accessible this pattern reversed. Implications of these results for relevant affect-cognition models are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

大量研究表明,积极情绪能提高创造性任务的表现,消极情绪能提高分析性任务的表现。本研究探讨了情感感受对认知表现的影响具有灵活性,而不是固定性的观点。与积极和消极情绪信号可访问处理倾向的价值的观点一致,发现情感感受对分析或创造性任务表现的影响是灵活的,取决于不同处理风格的相对可访问性(即启发式与系统式、全局与局部)。当全局处理取向是可访问的时,快乐的参与者对砖头有更多创造性的用途(实验 1),成功解决了更多的远程联想和顿悟问题(实验 2),表现出更广泛的分类(实验 3),而悲伤情绪的参与者则没有。当局部处理取向是可访问的时,这种模式就会反转。当启发式处理风格是可访问的时,快乐的参与者更有可能犯合取谬误(实验 3),并且表现出的锚定效应不那么明显(实验 4),而悲伤的参与者则不是。当系统处理风格是可访问的时,这种模式就会反转。这些结果对相关的情感认知模型的影响进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
A flexible influence of affective feelings on creative and analytic performance.情感感受对创造性和分析性表现的灵活影响。
Emotion. 2016 Sep;16(6):826-37. doi: 10.1037/emo0000188. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
2
The impact of negative emotions on self-concept abstraction depends on accessible information processing styles.消极情绪对自我概念抽象的影响取决于可及的信息加工方式。
Emotion. 2016 Oct;16(7):1040-1049. doi: 10.1037/emo0000193. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
3
Sometimes happy people focus on the trees and sad people focus on the forest: context-dependent effects of mood in impression formation.有时候,快乐的人关注树木,悲伤的人关注森林:心境在印象形成中的情境依存效应。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2012 Feb;38(2):220-32. doi: 10.1177/0146167211424166. Epub 2011 Sep 28.
4
Necessity is the mother of invention: avoidance motivation stimulates creativity through cognitive effort.需要乃发明之母:避免动机通过认知努力激发创造力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012 Aug;103(2):242-56. doi: 10.1037/a0028442. Epub 2012 May 7.
5
In search of the 'Aha!' experience: Elucidating the emotionality of insight problem-solving.探寻“顿悟”体验:阐明顿悟式问题解决中的情感因素
Br J Psychol. 2016 May;107(2):281-98. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12142. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
6
How does emotion influence different creative performances? The mediating role of cognitive flexibility.情绪如何影响不同的创造性表现?认知灵活性的中介作用。
Cogn Emot. 2014;28(5):834-44. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.854195. Epub 2013 Nov 18.
7
On being happy and mistaken: mood effects on the fundamental attribution error.论快乐与错误:情绪对基本归因错误的影响
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1998 Aug;75(2):318-31. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.75.2.318.
8
Phasic affective modulation of creativity.创造力的阶段性情感调节。
Exp Psychol. 2012 Jan 1;59(5):302-10. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000159.
9
The affective control of thought: malleable, not fixed.思维的情感控制:具有可塑性,而非固定不变。
Psychol Rev. 2014 Oct;121(4):600-18. doi: 10.1037/a0037669.
10
Why might negative mood help or hinder inhibitory performance? An exploration of thinking styles using a Navon induction.消极情绪为何能帮助或阻碍抑制性能?使用纳冯诱导探索思维风格。
Cogn Emot. 2022 Jun;36(4):705-712. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2021.2023108. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Active consideration in an emotional context: implications for information processing.在情感背景下的积极思考:对信息处理的影响。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 20;15:1367714. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1367714. eCollection 2024.
2
Evaluation of misinformation among pro-Ukrainian Latvians - the role of prior attitude, analytical thinking, and emotions.对亲乌克兰的拉脱维亚人当中错误信息的评估——先验态度、分析性思维和情感的作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 14;14:1165039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1165039. eCollection 2023.
3
Individual differences in naturally occurring affect predict conceptual breadth: evidence for the importance of arousal by valence interactions.
自然发生的情绪个体差异预测概念广度:效价交互作用唤醒的重要性证据。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Nov 18;7(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00447-w.
4
The Influence of Sense of Place on Elementary School Students' Creativity During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediating and Buffering Effects of Psychological Resilience.场所感对新冠疫情期间小学生创造力的影响:心理韧性的中介和缓冲作用
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 26;13:775624. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.775624. eCollection 2022.
5
Depression and Creativity During COVID-19: Psychological Resilience as a Mediator and Deliberate Rumination as a Moderator.新冠疫情期间的抑郁与创造力:心理韧性作为中介变量,沉思作为调节变量
Front Psychol. 2021 May 6;12:665961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.665961. eCollection 2021.
6
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news.依赖情感会促进对假新闻的信任。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2020 Oct 7;5(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3.
7
Affect and Cognition: Three Principles.情感与认知:三条原则。
Curr Opin Behav Sci. 2018 Feb;19:78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 22.