Xu Yanhua, Shao Jinlian, Zeng Wei, Wu Xingrou, Huang Dongtao, Zeng Yuqing, Wu Jiamin
College of Resource Environment and Tourism, Capital Normal University, Beijing, China.
School of Geography, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, China.
Front Psychol. 2021 May 6;12:665961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.665961. eCollection 2021.
The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which has had a significant impact on people's lives, has apparently increased the incidence of depression. Although the topic of how depression affects creativity is contested, previous research has revealed a significant relationship between the two. The purpose of this study is to further investigate the relationship and the mechanisms that operate between depression and creativity. A total of 881 students at an independent college in China completed a questionnaire consisting of the Self-Reported Depression Scale, Runco Ideational Behavior Scale, Psychological Resilience Scale, Deliberate Rumination Scale and demographic information. Among the respondents, 317 (36.0%) were male and 564 (64.0%) were female, all of whom were from the same grade. Correlation analyses were conducted, and then the researchers carried out mediation analysis and developed a moderated mediation model. The results indicated that (a) depression was positively related to creativity ( = 0.085, < 0.05); (b) psychological resilience mediated the relationship between depression and creativity; specifically, psychological resilience was negatively related to depression ( = -0.462, < 0.01), which in turn was positively related to creativity ( = 0.198, < 0.01); and (c) deliberate rumination moderated the relationship between depression and psychological resilience, showing a significant negative correlation with depression ( = 0.138, < 0.01), psychological resilience ( = 0.078, < 0.05), and creativity ( = 0.288, < 0.05); specifically, higher levels of deliberate rumination strengthened the negative correlation between psychological resilience and depression. The results suggest that depression is a positive predictor of creativity and may promote creativity to some extent. Further, individuals with greater psychological resilience are more creative than those with less psychological resilience, as it is a question of whether they can and to what extent they can effectively use depression as an emotional resource. Last, an individual's level of deliberate rumination moderates the mediating process, especially at the stage where depression is associated with psychological resilience. These findings advance understanding of the mechanisms that operate between depression and creativity.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行对人们的生活产生了重大影响,显然增加了抑郁症的发病率。尽管抑郁症如何影响创造力这一话题存在争议,但先前的研究已经揭示了两者之间的显著关系。本研究的目的是进一步探究抑郁症与创造力之间的关系以及其中起作用的机制。中国一所独立学院的881名学生完成了一份问卷,该问卷包括自评抑郁量表、Runco创意行为量表、心理韧性量表、刻意沉思量表和人口统计学信息。在受访者中,317名(36.0%)为男性,564名(64.0%)为女性,他们均来自同一年级。进行了相关分析,然后研究人员进行了中介分析并建立了一个有调节的中介模型。结果表明:(a)抑郁症与创造力呈正相关( = 0.085, < 0.05);(b)心理韧性在抑郁症与创造力的关系中起中介作用;具体而言,心理韧性与抑郁症呈负相关( = -0.462, < 0.01),而心理韧性又与创造力呈正相关( = 0.198, < 0.01);(c)刻意沉思调节了抑郁症与心理韧性之间的关系,与抑郁症( = 0.138, < 0.01)、心理韧性( = 0.078, < 0.05)和创造力( = 0.288, < 0.05)均呈显著负相关;具体而言,更高水平的刻意沉思强化了心理韧性与抑郁症之间的负相关。研究结果表明,抑郁症是创造力的一个积极预测因素,可能在一定程度上促进创造力。此外,心理韧性较强的个体比心理韧性较弱的个体更具创造力,因为这关乎他们能否以及在多大程度上能有效地将抑郁症作为一种情感资源。最后,个体的刻意沉思水平调节了中介过程,尤其是在抑郁症与心理韧性相关的阶段。这些发现推进了对抑郁症与创造力之间起作用机制的理解。