Bridgers Franca Ferrari, Kacinik Natalie
Department of Speech and Theatre Arts, Queensborough Community College, CUNY, Queens, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College, CUNY, Brooklyn, New York, NY, USA.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2017 Feb;46(1):175-200. doi: 10.1007/s10936-016-9427-1.
The majority of words in most languages consist of derived poly-morphemic words but a cross-linguistic review of the literature (Amenta and Crepaldi in Front Psychol 3:232-243, 2012) shows a contradictory picture with respect to how such words are represented and processed. The current study examined the effects of linearity and structural complexity on the processing of Italian derived words. Participants performed a lexical decision task on three types of prefixed and suffixed words and nonwords differing in the complexity of their internal structure. The processing of these words was indeed found to vary according to the nature of the affixes, the order in which they appear, and the type of information the affix encodes. The results thus indicate that derived words are not a uniform class and the best account of these findings appears to be a constraint-based or probabilistic multi-route processing model (e.g., Kuperman et al. in Lang Cogn Process 23:1089-1132, 2008; J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 35:876-895, 2009; J Mem Lang 62:83-97, 2010).
大多数语言中的大多数单词由派生的多语素词组成,但对文献的跨语言综述(阿门塔和克雷帕尔迪,《心理学前沿》3:232 - 243,2012年)显示,关于此类单词如何被表征和处理存在矛盾的情况。当前的研究考察了线性和结构复杂性对意大利派生单词处理的影响。参与者对三种类型的前缀词、后缀词以及内部结构复杂性不同的非词执行词汇判断任务。确实发现这些单词的处理会因词缀的性质、它们出现的顺序以及词缀编码的信息类型而有所不同。因此,结果表明派生单词不是一个统一的类别,而对这些发现的最佳解释似乎是基于约束或概率的多路径处理模型(例如,库珀曼等人,《语言认知过程》23:1089 - 1132,2008年;《实验心理学杂志:人类感知与表现》35:876 - 895,2009年;《记忆与语言杂志》62:83 - 97,2010年)。