Nassar Ahmed, Liu Qiang, Farias Kevin, Buccini Laura, Baldwin William, Bennett Ana, Mangino Martin, Irefin Samuel, Cywinski Jacek, Okamoto Toshihiro, Diago Uso Teresa, Iuppa Giuseppe, Soliman Basem, Miller Charles, Quintini Cristiano
Transplantation Center, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Artif Organs. 2016 Oct;40(10):999-1008. doi: 10.1111/aor.12699. Epub 2016 Apr 18.
Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has been introduced as a promising technology to preserve and possibly repair marginal liver grafts. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of temperature on the preservation of donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver grafts in an ex vivo perfusion model after NMP (38.5°C) and subnormothermic machine perfusion (SNMP, 21°C) with a control group preserved by cold storage (CS, 4°C). Fifteen porcine livers with 60 min of warm ischemia were preserved for 10 h by NMP, SNMP or CS (n = 5/group). After the preservation phase all livers were reperfused for 24 h in an isolated perfusion system with whole blood at 38.5°C to simulate transplantation. At the end of transplant simulation, the NMP group showed significantly lower hepatocellular enzyme level (AST: 277 ± 69 U/L; ALT: 22 ± 2 U/L; P < 0.03) compared to both SNMP (AST: 3243 ± 1048 U/L; ALT: 127 ± 70 U/L) and CS (AST: 3150 ± 1546 U/L; ALT: 185 ± 97 U/L). There was no significant difference between SNMP and CS. Bile production was significantly higher in the NMP group (219 ± 43 mL; P < 0.01) compared to both SNMP (49 ± 84 mL) and CS (12 ± 16 mL) with no significant difference between the latter two groups. Histologically, the NMP livers showed preserved cellular architecture compared to the SNMP and CS groups. NMP was able to recover DCD livers showing superior hepatocellular integrity, biliary function, and microcirculation compared to SNMP and CS. SNMP showed some significant benefit over CS, yet has not shown any advantage over NMP.
常温机器灌注(NMP)已作为一种有前景的技术被引入,用于保存并可能修复边缘性肝移植供肝。本研究的目的是在NMP(38.5°C)和亚常温机器灌注(SNMP,21°C)后的体外灌注模型中,比较温度对心脏死亡后捐赠(DCD)肝移植供肝保存的影响,并与通过冷保存(CS,4°C)的对照组进行比较。将15个经历60分钟热缺血的猪肝通过NMP、SNMP或CS保存10小时(每组n = 5)。在保存阶段结束后,所有肝脏在38.5°C下用全血在离体灌注系统中再灌注24小时以模拟移植。在移植模拟结束时,与SNMP组(AST:3243±1048 U/L;ALT:127±70 U/L)和CS组(AST:3150±1546 U/L;ALT:185±97 U/L)相比,NMP组的肝细胞酶水平显著更低(AST:277±69 U/L;ALT:22±2 U/L;P < 0.03)。SNMP组和CS组之间无显著差异。与SNMP组(49±84 mL)和CS组(12±16 mL)相比,NMP组的胆汁生成显著更高(219±43 mL;P < 0.01),后两组之间无显著差异。组织学上,与SNMP组和CS组相比,NMP组的肝脏显示出保留的细胞结构。与SNMP组和CS组相比,NMP能够恢复DCD肝脏,显示出更好的肝细胞完整性、胆汁功能和微循环。SNMP组相对于CS组显示出一些显著益处,但尚未显示出优于NMP组的任何优势。