Hommel I, Wollersheim H, Tack C J, Mulder J, van Gurp P J, Hulscher M E J L
Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Department of Internal Medicine, Radboud University Medical Centre, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Diabet Med. 2017 Feb;34(2):278-285. doi: 10.1111/dme.13130. Epub 2016 May 11.
To assess the impact of a multifaceted strategy to improve perioperative diabetes care throughout the hospital care pathway.
We conducted a controlled before-and-after study in six hospitals. The purpose of the strategy was to target four predominant barriers that obstruct optimal care delivery. We provided feedback on baseline indicator performance, developed a multidisciplinary protocol and patient information, and provided professional education. After a 6-month intervention, we determined the performance changes against three outcome indicators and nine process indicators using data on 811 patients with diabetes who underwent major surgery. The progress of the interventions was monitored closely.
Two process indicators improved significantly in the intervention hospitals: the proportion of patients for whom glycaemic control had been evaluated preoperatively increased by 9% (P < 0.002) and the proportion of patients with blood glucose measurements within 1 h after surgery increased by 29% (P < 0.0001). Four other process indicators and all three outcome indicators improved more in the intervention hospitals than in the control hospitals, but the differences were not statistically significant. These included the proportion of patients with all glucose values at 6-10 mmol/l (+3%) and the proportion of patients with hyperglycaemia (-8%). The implementation of the multidisciplinary protocol was still ongoing after the 6-month intervention period.
The multifaceted improvement strategy had a limited impact on the quality of perioperative diabetes care. This study demonstrates the complexity of improving perioperative diabetes care throughout the multiprofessional hospital care pathway.
评估一项多方面策略对改善整个医院护理路径中围手术期糖尿病护理的影响。
我们在六家医院进行了一项前后对照研究。该策略的目的是针对阻碍最佳护理提供的四个主要障碍。我们提供了基线指标表现的反馈,制定了多学科方案和患者信息,并提供了专业教育。经过6个月的干预后,我们使用811例接受大手术的糖尿病患者的数据,确定了三个结果指标和九个过程指标的表现变化。密切监测干预措施的进展情况。
干预医院的两个过程指标有显著改善:术前评估血糖控制情况的患者比例增加了9%(P<0.002),术后1小时内进行血糖测量的患者比例增加了29%(P<0.0001)。干预医院的其他四个过程指标和所有三个结果指标的改善程度均高于对照医院,但差异无统计学意义。这些指标包括血糖值在6-10 mmol/l的患者比例(+3%)和高血糖患者比例(-8%)。在6个月的干预期结束后,多学科方案仍在实施中。
多方面的改进策略对围手术期糖尿病护理质量的影响有限。本研究表明,在多专业医院护理路径中改善围手术期糖尿病护理具有复杂性。