Suppr超能文献

辅助评估:方法分类及优缺点概述

Assisted assessment: a taxonomy of approaches and an outline of strengths and weaknesses.

作者信息

Campione J C

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 1989 Mar;22(3):151-65. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200303.

Abstract

Traditional approaches to both the assessment of student abilities and the design of instructional programs have recently come under strong attack. Of particular concern to many is the nature of the link between assessment and instruction. Some of the criticisms are reviewed, and a set of alternative approaches designed to overcome the difficulties is presented. The major focus is on dynamic, as opposed to static, assessment. A major feature of these approaches is the provision, to the student, of some form of assistance designed to influence performance and hence reveal students' potential for change. Within this general approach, specific applications differ along three dimensions. The first, focus, refers to the goal of evaluating change itself or the processes presumed to underlie change. The second, intervention, refers to the fact that the assistance included in the assessment can be given in either a standardized or clinical fashion. And the third, target, reflects the fact that assessment can be aimed at either domain-general or domain-specific skills. The distinct approaches that have been developed are categorized, and their respective strengths and weaknesses discussed. Suggestions for future research are made.

摘要

传统的学生能力评估方法和教学计划设计方法最近受到了强烈抨击。许多人特别关注的是评估与教学之间联系的性质。本文回顾了一些批评意见,并提出了一套旨在克服这些困难的替代方法。主要重点是动态评估,而非静态评估。这些方法的一个主要特点是向学生提供某种形式的帮助,旨在影响其表现,从而揭示学生的改变潜力。在这种总体方法中,具体应用在三个维度上有所不同。第一个维度是重点,指的是评估变化本身或假定为变化基础的过程的目标。第二个维度是干预,指的是评估中包含的帮助可以以标准化或临床方式提供。第三个维度是目标,反映出评估可以针对一般领域技能或特定领域技能。已开发出的不同方法进行了分类,并讨论了它们各自的优缺点。还提出了对未来研究的建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验