• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用代数学习的动态评估进行数学问题解决困难的两阶段筛查。

Two-stage screening for math problem-solving difficulty using dynamic assessment of algebraic learning.

机构信息

Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.

出版信息

J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):372-80. doi: 10.1177/0022219411407867. Epub 2011 Jun 17.

DOI:10.1177/0022219411407867
PMID:21685352
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3185132/
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to explore the utility of a dynamic assessment (DA) of algebraic learning in predicting third graders' development of mathematics word-problem difficulty. In the fall, 122 third-grade students were assessed on a test of math word-problem skill and DA of algebraic learning. In the spring, they were assessed on word-problem performance. Logistic regression was conducted to contrast two models. One relied exclusively on the fall test of math word-problem skill to predict word-problem difficulty on the spring outcome (less than the 25th percentile). The second model relied on a combination of the fall test of math word-problem skill and the fall DA to predict the same outcome. Holding sensitivity at 87.5%, the universal screener alone resulted in a high proportion of false positives, which was practically reduced when DA was included in the prediction model. Findings are discussed in terms of a two-stage process for screening students within a responsiveness-to-intervention prevention model.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨动态评估(DA)在预测三年级学生数学应用题难度发展方面的效用。在秋季,122 名三年级学生接受了数学应用题技能测试和代数学习 DA 的评估。在春季,他们接受了应用题表现的评估。进行逻辑回归以对比两个模型。一个模型仅依赖于秋季的数学应用题技能测试来预测春季结果(低于第 25 百分位数)的应用题难度。第二个模型依赖于秋季的数学应用题技能测试和秋季 DA 的组合来预测相同的结果。在保持 87.5%的敏感性的情况下,仅使用通用筛查器会导致大量假阳性,而当 DA 纳入预测模型时,这一比例实际上会降低。研究结果从反应性干预预防模型中筛选学生的两阶段过程进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Two-stage screening for math problem-solving difficulty using dynamic assessment of algebraic learning.使用代数学习的动态评估进行数学问题解决困难的两阶段筛查。
J Learn Disabil. 2011 Jul-Aug;44(4):372-80. doi: 10.1177/0022219411407867. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
2
Dynamic Assessment of Algebraic Learning in Predicting Third Graders' Development of Mathematical Problem Solving.代数学习的动态评估对三年级学生数学问题解决能力发展的预测作用
J Educ Psychol. 2008 Nov;100(4):829-850. doi: 10.1037/a0012657.
3
Do word-problem features differentially affect problem difficulty as a function of students' mathematics difficulty with and without reading difficulty?文字问题特征是否会根据学生有无阅读困难时的数学难度差异,对问题难度产生不同影响?
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Mar-Apr;42(2):99-110. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326211. Epub 2008 Nov 14.
4
What role do comprehension-oriented learning strategies have in solving math calculation and word problems at the end of middle school?在中学结束时,理解导向型学习策略在解决数学计算题和应用题方面有什么作用?
Br J Educ Psychol. 2020 Jun;90 Suppl 1:105-123. doi: 10.1111/bjep.12308. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
5
Prediction and stability of mathematics skill and difficulty.数学技能和难度的预测与稳定性。
J Learn Disabil. 2013 Sep-Oct;46(5):428-43. doi: 10.1177/0022219411436214. Epub 2012 Mar 5.
6
The Effects of Algebraic Equation Solving Intervention for Students With Mathematics Learning Difficulties.《代数方程解题干预对数学学习困难学生的影响》。
J Learn Disabil. 2021 Mar;54(2):111-123. doi: 10.1177/0022219420930814. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
7
Does Early Algebraic Reasoning Differ as a Function of Students' Difficulty with Calculations versus Word Problems?早期代数推理是否因学生在计算与文字问题上的困难程度不同而有所差异?
Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2014 Aug;29(3):106-116. doi: 10.1111/ldrp.12037.
8
Positive mood and math performance.积极情绪与数学成绩。
J Learn Disabil. 1991 Oct;24(8):490-4. doi: 10.1177/002221949102400808.
9
Working memory, worry, and algebraic ability.工作记忆、担忧与代数能力。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 May;121:120-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2013.12.001. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
10
Problem-solving strategies for teaching mathematics to deaf students.向聋生教授数学的解题策略。
Am Ann Deaf. 1998 Oct;143(4):325-36. doi: 10.1353/aad.2012.0082.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic Assessment for Identifying Spanish-Speaking English Learners' Risk for Mathematics Disabilities: Does Language of Administration Matter?动态评估识别西班牙语英语学习者数学学习障碍风险:评估语言是否重要?
J Learn Disabil. 2020 Sep/Oct;53(5):380-398. doi: 10.1177/0022219419898887. Epub 2020 Jan 23.
2
Smart RTI: A Next-Generation Approach to Multilevel Prevention.智能应对反应性干预:多级预防的新一代方法。
Except Child. 2012 Spring;78(3):263-279. doi: 10.1177/001440291207800301.
3
First-grade cognitive abilities as long-term predictors of reading comprehension and disability status.一年级认知能力是阅读理解和残疾状况的长期预测指标。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):217-31. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442154.
4
Responsiveness-to-intervention: a decade later.反应性干预:十年后。
J Learn Disabil. 2012 May-Jun;45(3):195-203. doi: 10.1177/0022219412442150.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Preventative Tutoring on the Mathematical Problem Solving of Third-Grade Students With Math and Reading Difficulties.预防性辅导对有数学和阅读困难的三年级学生数学问题解决能力的影响。
Except Child. 2008 Winter;74(2):155-173. doi: 10.1177/001440290807400202.
2
Problem Solving and Computational Skill: Are They Shared or Distinct Aspects of Mathematical Cognition?问题解决与计算技能:它们是数学认知中相互关联还是截然不同的方面?
J Educ Psychol. 2008 Feb 1;100(1):30-47. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.30.
3
Dynamic Assessment of Algebraic Learning in Predicting Third Graders' Development of Mathematical Problem Solving.代数学习的动态评估对三年级学生数学问题解决能力发展的预测作用
J Educ Psychol. 2008 Nov;100(4):829-850. doi: 10.1037/a0012657.
4
Implementation of response to intervention: a snapshot of progress.干预反应的实施:进展概况
J Learn Disabil. 2009 Jan-Feb;42(1):85-95. doi: 10.1177/0022219408326214.
5
Learning potential among institutionalized young adult retardates.收容机构中年轻成年智障者的学习潜力。
Am J Ment Defic. 1967 Nov;72(3):404-11.
6
Children's learning and transfer of inductive reasoning rules: studies of proximal development.儿童归纳推理规则的学习与迁移:近发展区研究
Child Dev. 1986 Oct;57(5):1087-99. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.1986.tb00438.x.
7
Assisted assessment: a taxonomy of approaches and an outline of strengths and weaknesses.辅助评估:方法分类及优缺点概述
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Mar;22(3):151-65. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200303.
8
The science of choosing the right decision threshold in high-stakes diagnostics.在高风险诊断中选择正确决策阈值的科学。
Am Psychol. 1992 Apr;47(4):522-32. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.47.4.522.