• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科医生在评估同行时报告的临床事件。

Clinical events reported by surgeons assessing their peers.

作者信息

Rey-Conde Therese, Wysocki Arkadiusz P, North John B, Allen Jennifer, Ware Robert S, Watters David A

机构信息

Division of Research, Audit and Academic Surgery, Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons, 7476, East Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, 4169, Australia.

Department of Surgery, Logan Hospital, Logan City, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2016 Oct;212(4):748-754. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.027
PMID:27090563
Abstract

BACKGROUND

All surgical deaths in Queensland, Australia are reviewed by external surgeon peers, and clinical events are recorded. The study objective was to classify clinical events in surgical patients who died.

METHODS

Deaths notified to the Queensland Audit of Surgical Mortality between 2007 and 2013 were assessed by surgeons' peers who decided whether a clinical event occurred. The most serious clinical event per patient was analyzed.

RESULTS

Peer surgeons reviewed 4,816 deaths. Most patients (70.7%) had no clinical event. Events were preventable in 58% of patients and less than 1 in 10 events was severe. The most frequent events were classified as patient assessment (34.5%), suboptimal therapy (15.3%), and delays (15.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Peer review of all surgical deaths identifies preventable clinical events and provides opportunities to improve decision making, better therapy and reduce delay in implementing appropriate surgical care. Review feedback to surgeons and other stakeholders should improve patient safety and quality.

摘要

背景

澳大利亚昆士兰州的所有外科手术死亡病例均由外部外科同行进行审查,并记录临床事件。本研究的目的是对死亡的外科手术患者的临床事件进行分类。

方法

2007年至2013年间通知昆士兰外科死亡率审计的死亡病例由外科同行进行评估,他们决定是否发生了临床事件。分析了每位患者最严重的临床事件。

结果

同行外科医生审查了4816例死亡病例。大多数患者(70.7%)没有临床事件。58%的患者的事件是可预防的,每10起事件中严重事件不到1起。最常见的事件分类为患者评估(34.5%)、治疗欠佳(15.3%)和延误(15.1%)。

结论

对所有外科手术死亡病例进行同行审查可识别可预防的临床事件,并提供改进决策、优化治疗和减少实施适当外科护理延误的机会。向外科医生和其他利益相关者提供审查反馈应可提高患者安全性和质量。

相似文献

1
Clinical events reported by surgeons assessing their peers.外科医生在评估同行时报告的临床事件。
Am J Surg. 2016 Oct;212(4):748-754. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.01.027. Epub 2016 Mar 23.
2
Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality: concordance between reported and audited clinical events and delays in management in surgical mortality patients.澳大利亚和新西兰外科手术死亡率审计:手术死亡患者报告的与审计的临床事件之间的一致性及管理延误情况
ANZ J Surg. 2014 Sep;84(9):618-23. doi: 10.1111/ans.12642. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
3
Systemic predictors of adverse events in a national surgical mortality audit: analysis of peer-review data from Australia and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality.一项全国性手术死亡率审计中不良事件的系统预测因素:对来自澳大利亚和新西兰手术死亡率审计同行评审数据的分析
ANZ J Surg. 2019 Nov;89(11):1398-1403. doi: 10.1111/ans.15386. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
4
Potentially preventable deaths in the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality.《维多利亚州外科手术死亡率审计中潜在可预防的死亡》
ANZ J Surg. 2017 Jan;87(1-2):17-21. doi: 10.1111/ans.13804. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
5
Mapping changes in surgical mortality over 9 years by peer review audit.通过同行评审审计来绘制9年间手术死亡率的变化情况。
Br J Surg. 2005 Nov;92(11):1449-52. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5082.
6
The Western Australian Audit of Surgical Mortality: advancing surgical accountability.西澳大利亚外科手术死亡率审计:提升手术责任性
Med J Aust. 2005 Nov 21;183(10):504-8. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb07150.x.
7
The Australian and New Zealand Audit of Surgical Mortality-birth, deaths, and carriage.澳大利亚和新西兰手术死亡率-出生、死亡和携带情况审计。
Ann Surg. 2015 Feb;261(2):304-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000581.
8
Post-mortem general surgeon reflection on decision-making: a mixed-methods study of mortality audit data.普通外科医生对尸检决策的反思:一项关于死亡率审计数据的混合方法研究
ANZ J Surg. 2018 Oct;88(10):993-997. doi: 10.1111/ans.14796. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
9
Advanced Practitioners Are Peers in Trauma Performance Improvement Peer Review.高级从业者是创伤绩效改进同行评审中的同行。
J Trauma Nurs. 2016 Mar-Apr;23(2):71-6; quiz E1-2. doi: 10.1097/JTN.0000000000000189.
10
Surgical Mortality Audit-lessons Learned in a Developing Nation.外科手术死亡率审计——一个发展中国家的经验教训
Int Surg. 2015 Jun;100(6):1026-32. doi: 10.9738/INTSURG-D-14-00212.1.

引用本文的文献

1
Making Surgery as Safe as It Should Be: A Qualitative Study.《让手术安全无虞:一项定性研究》
Am J Med Qual. 2023;38(5):238-244. doi: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000139. Epub 2023 Jul 27.