Valtorta Nicole K, Kanaan Mona, Gilbody Simon, Hanratty Barbara
Department of Health Sciences, University of York, Heslington, York, UK.
Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 18;6(4):e010799. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010799.
We present a novel way of classifying and comparing measures of social relationships to help readers interpret the growing literature on loneliness and social isolation and to provide researchers with a starting point to guide their choice of measuring tool.
Measures of social relationships used in epidemiological studies were identified from two systematic reviews-one review on the association between social relationships and health and social care service use, and a second review on the association between social relationships and health. Questions from each measure were retrieved and tabulated to derive a classification of social relationship measures.
We present a classification of measures according to two dimensions: (1) whether instruments cover structural or functional aspects of social relationships and (2) the degree of subjectivity asked of respondents. We explain how this classification can be used to clarify the remit of the many questionnaires used in the literature and to compare them.
Different dimensions of social relationships are likely to have different implications for health. Our classification of social relationship measures transcends disciplinary and conceptual boundaries, allowing researchers to compare tools that developed from different theoretical perspectives. Careful choice of measures is essential to further our understanding of the links between social relationships and health, to identify people in need of help and to design appropriate prevention and intervention strategies.
我们提出一种对社会关系测量方法进行分类和比较的新方法,以帮助读者解读关于孤独和社会隔离的日益增多的文献,并为研究人员提供一个起点,指导他们选择测量工具。
从两项系统评价中确定了流行病学研究中使用的社会关系测量方法——一项关于社会关系与健康及社会护理服务使用之间关联的评价,另一项关于社会关系与健康之间关联的评价。检索并列出每项测量方法中的问题,以得出社会关系测量方法的分类。
我们根据两个维度对测量方法进行了分类:(1)工具是否涵盖社会关系的结构或功能方面;(2)对受访者要求的主观程度。我们解释了这种分类如何用于阐明文献中使用的众多问卷的范围并进行比较。
社会关系的不同维度可能对健康有不同影响。我们对社会关系测量方法的分类跨越了学科和概念界限,使研究人员能够比较从不同理论视角发展而来的工具。谨慎选择测量方法对于加深我们对社会关系与健康之间联系的理解、识别需要帮助的人群以及设计适当的预防和干预策略至关重要。