Frąc Magdalena, Gryta Agata, Oszust Karolina, Kotowicz Natalia
Laboratory of Molecular and Environmental Microbiology, Department of Soil and Plant System, Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences Lublin, Poland.
Front Microbiol. 2016 Apr 6;7:489. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00489. eCollection 2016.
The need for finding fungicides against Fusarium is a key step in the chemical plant protection and using appropriate chemical agents. Existing, conventional methods of evaluation of Fusarium isolates resistance to fungicides are costly, time-consuming and potentially environmentally harmful due to usage of high amounts of potentially toxic chemicals. Therefore, the development of fast, accurate and effective detection methods for Fusarium resistance to fungicides is urgently required. MT2 microplates (Biolog(TM)) method is traditionally used for bacteria identification and the evaluation of their ability to utilize different carbon substrates. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no reports concerning the use of this technical tool to determine fungicides resistance of the Fusarium isolates. For this reason, the objectives of this study are to develop a fast method for Fusarium resistance to fungicides detection and to validate the effectiveness approach between both traditional hole-plate and MT2 microplates assays. In presented study MT2 microplate-based assay was evaluated for potential use as an alternative resistance detection method. This was carried out using three commercially available fungicides, containing following active substances: triazoles (tebuconazole), benzimidazoles (carbendazim) and strobilurins (azoxystrobin), in six concentrations (0, 0.0005, 0.005, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2%), for nine selected Fusarium isolates. In this study, the particular concentrations of each fungicides was loaded into MT2 microplate wells. The wells were inoculated with the Fusarium mycelium suspended in PM4-IF inoculating fluid. Before inoculation the suspension was standardized for each isolates into 75% of transmittance. Traditional hole-plate method was used as a control assay. The fungicides concentrations in control method were the following: 0, 0.0005, 0.005, 0.05, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, 25, and 50%. Strong relationships between MT2 microplate and traditional hole-plate methods were observed regarding to the detection of Fusarium resistance to various fungicides and their concentrations. The tebuconazole was most potent, providing increased efficiency in the growth inhibition of all tested isolates. Almost all among tested isolates were resistant to azoxystrobin-based fungicide. Overall, the MT2 microplates method was effective and timesaving, alternative method for determining Fusarium resistance/sensitivity to fungicides, compering to traditional hole-plate approach.
寻找抗镰刀菌杀菌剂是化学植物保护及使用合适化学药剂的关键一步。现有的评估镰刀菌分离株对杀菌剂抗性的传统方法成本高、耗时,且由于使用大量潜在有毒化学物质,可能对环境有害。因此,迫切需要开发快速、准确且有效的检测镰刀菌对杀菌剂抗性的方法。MT2微孔板(Biolog™)方法传统上用于细菌鉴定及其利用不同碳底物能力的评估。然而,据我们所知,尚无关于使用此技术工具来确定镰刀菌分离株对杀菌剂抗性的报道。因此,本研究的目的是开发一种快速检测镰刀菌对杀菌剂抗性的方法,并验证传统孔板法和MT2微孔板法之间的有效性。在本研究中,对基于MT2微孔板的检测方法作为一种替代抗性检测方法的潜在用途进行了评估。使用三种市售杀菌剂进行此项评估,这些杀菌剂含有以下活性成分:三唑类(戊唑醇)、苯并咪唑类(多菌灵)和甲氧基丙烯酸酯类(嘧菌酯),浓度为六种(0、0.0005、0.005、0.05、0.1、0.2%),针对九个选定的镰刀菌分离株。在本研究中,将每种杀菌剂的特定浓度加入MT2微孔板孔中。孔中接种悬浮于PM4 - IF接种液中的镰刀菌菌丝体。接种前,将每种分离株的悬浮液标准化至透光率为75%。传统孔板法用作对照检测。对照方法中的杀菌剂浓度如下:0、0.0005、0.005、0.05、0.5、1、2、5、10、25和50%。在检测镰刀菌对各种杀菌剂及其浓度的抗性方面,观察到MT2微孔板法与传统孔板法之间存在密切关系。戊唑醇效力最强,对所有测试分离株的生长抑制效率更高。几乎所有测试分离株都对嘧菌酯类杀菌剂具有抗性。总体而言,与传统孔板法相比,MT2微孔板法是一种有效且省时的确定镰刀菌对杀菌剂抗性/敏感性的替代方法。