Wada Yuko, Aiba Takeshi, Tsujita Yasuyuki, Itoh Hideki, Wada Mitsuru, Nakajima Ikutaro, Ishibashi Kohei, Okamura Hideo, Miyamoto Koji, Noda Takashi, Sugano Yasuo, Kanzaki Hideaki, Anzai Toshihisa, Kusano Kengo, Yasuda Satoshi, Horie Minoru, Ogawa Hisao
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan; Department of Cardiovascular and Respiratory Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
J Arrhythm. 2016 Apr;32(2):82-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.09.002. Epub 2015 Nov 2.
Landiolol effectively controls rapid heart rate in atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL) patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. However, predicting landiolol Responders and Non-Responders and patients who will experience adverse effects remains a challenge. The aim of this study was to clarify the potential applicability of landiolol for rapid AF/AFL and refractory ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VTs) in patients with heart failure.
A total of 39 patients with AF/AFL with ventricular response ≥120 bpm and 12 VTs were retrospectively enrolled. Landiolol Responders for rapid AF/AFL were defined as patients whose ventricular response was suppressed to less than 110 bpm or decreased by ≥20% from the initial heart rate after administration of landiolol. Responders for VTs were defined as patients with no recurrent VTs during the 24 h after the initiation of landiolol.
For AF/AFL, 29 patients (74%) were Responders. In nine patients (31%), AF was spontaneously terminated after starting landiolol. Eight Non-Responders (80%) needed to have AF terminated by cardioversion. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at baseline was significantly associated with landiolol efficacy. For VTs, seven patients (58%) were Responders, and smaller LV diastolic and systolic diameters were associated with landiolol efficacy. Hypotension after landiolol treatment occurred in 5 of 51 patients, and lower LV systolic function was associated with the development of adverse events.
Landiolol is effective in patients with heart failure not only due to rapid AF/AFL but also due to VTs. However, preserved LVEF is important for efficacy and safety in landiolol treatment.
兰地洛尔可有效控制左心室(LV)功能不全的心房颤动或扑动(AF/AFL)患者的快速心率。然而,预测兰地洛尔的反应者和无反应者以及会出现不良反应的患者仍然是一项挑战。本研究的目的是阐明兰地洛尔在心力衰竭患者快速AF/AFL和难治性室性心律失常(VTs)中的潜在适用性。
回顾性纳入39例心室率≥120次/分的AF/AFL患者和12例VTs患者。快速AF/AFL的兰地洛尔反应者定义为在给予兰地洛尔后心室率被抑制至低于110次/分或较初始心率降低≥20%的患者。VTs的反应者定义为在开始使用兰地洛尔后24小时内无VTs复发的患者。
对于AF/AFL,29例患者(74%)为反应者。9例患者(31%)在开始使用兰地洛尔后AF自发终止。8例无反应者(80%)需要通过心脏复律终止AF。基线时的左心室射血分数(LVEF)与兰地洛尔疗效显著相关。对于VTs,7例患者(58%)为反应者,较小的左心室舒张和收缩直径与兰地洛尔疗效相关。51例患者中有5例在兰地洛尔治疗后出现低血压,较低的左心室收缩功能与不良事件的发生相关。
兰地洛尔不仅对心力衰竭患者的快速AF/AFL有效,对VTs也有效。然而,保留LVEF对兰地洛尔治疗的疗效和安全性很重要。