Department of Psychology, Chung Yuan Christian University, No. 200, Chung Pei Rd, Chung Li City 32023, Taiwan, ROC.
Department of Psychology, National Chengchi University, No. 64, Sec. 2, ZhiNan Rd., Wenshan District, Taipei City 11605, Taiwan, ROC; Research Center for Mind, Brain, and Learning, National Chengchi University, Taiwan, ROC.
Psychiatry Res. 2016 Jun 30;240:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2016.04.019. Epub 2016 Apr 10.
This study investigated the differential effects of two attention bias modification (ABM) with different stimulus durations. Seventy-two undergraduates with subclinical social anxiety were randomly assigned to one of four conditions: an ABM condition with either a 100-ms or a 500-ms stimulus duration (ABM-100/ ABM-500) or an attention placebo (AP) condition with either a 100-ms or a 500-ms stimulus duration (AP-100/ AP-500). Participants completed the pre-assessments, eight attentional training sessions, and post-assessments. A modified Posner paradigm was used to assess changes in attentional processing. After completion of attentional training, the ABM-100 group significantly speeded up their responses to 100-ms invalid trials, regardless of the word type. The ABM-100 group also exhibited significant reduced latencies to 500-ms invalid social threat trials and a marginally significant reduced latencies to 500-ms invalid neutral trials. The ABM-500 group showed significant reduced latencies to 500-ms invalid social threat trials. Both ABMs significantly reduced participants' fear of negative evaluations and interactional anxiousness relative to their comparative AP. The effects on social anxiety did not differ between the two ABMs. This study suggests that although both ABMs using short and long stimulus durations reduce some aspects of social anxiety, they influence participants' attentional disengagement in different ways.
本研究考察了两种注意偏向修正(ABM)在不同刺激时长下的差异效应。72 名有亚临床社交焦虑的本科生被随机分配到以下四种条件之一:一种是刺激时长为 100 毫秒或 500 毫秒的 ABM 条件(ABM-100/ABM-500),另一种是刺激时长为 100 毫秒或 500 毫秒的注意安慰剂(AP)条件(AP-100/AP-500)。参与者完成了预评估、八次注意训练和后评估。使用改良的 Posner 范式来评估注意加工的变化。在注意训练完成后,ABM-100 组无论单词类型如何,都显著加快了对 100 毫秒无效试验的反应速度。ABM-100 组对 500 毫秒无效的社交威胁试验的潜伏期也显著缩短,对 500 毫秒无效的中性试验的潜伏期则略有缩短。ABM-500 组对 500 毫秒无效的社交威胁试验的潜伏期也显著缩短。与各自的 AP 相比,两种 ABM 都显著降低了参与者对负面评价的恐惧和互动性焦虑。两种 ABM 对社交焦虑的影响没有差异。本研究表明,尽管使用短刺激时长和长刺激时长的两种 ABM 都能降低某些方面的社交焦虑,但它们以不同的方式影响参与者的注意力脱离。