Kühlmann Anne Y R, Etnel Jonathan R G, Roos-Hesselink Jolien W, Jeekel Johannes, Bogers Ad J J C, Takkenberg Johanna J M
Department of Pediatric Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Apr 19;16:69. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0244-0.
Adverse effects, treatment resistance and high costs associated with pharmacological treatment of hypertension have led to growing interest in non-pharmacological complementary therapies such as music interventions. This meta-analysis aims to provide an overview of reported evidence on the efficacy of music interventions in the treatment of hypertension.
A systematic literature search was conducted for publications on the effect of music interventions on blood pressure in adult hypertensive subjects published between January 1990-June 2014. Randomized controlled trials with a follow-up duration ≥28 days were included. Blood pressure measures were pooled using inverse variance weighting.
Of the 1689 abstracts reviewed, 10 randomized controlled trials were included. Random-effects pooling of the music intervention groups showed a trend toward a decrease in mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) from 144 mmHg(95 % CI:137-152) to 134 mmHg(95 % CI:124-144), and in mean diastolic blood pressure (DBP) from 84 mmHg(95 % CI:78-89) to 78 mmHg(95 % CI:73-84). Fixed-effect analysis of a subgroup of 3 trials with valid control groups showed a significant decrease in pooled mean SBP and DBP in both intervention and control groups. A comparison between music intervention groups and control groups was not possible due to unavailable measures of dispersion.
This systematic review and meta-analysis revealed a trend towards a decrease in blood pressure in hypertensive patients who received music interventions, but failed to establish a cause-effect relationship between music interventions and blood pressure reduction. Considering the potential value of this safe, low-cost intervention, well-designed, high quality and sufficiently powered randomized studies assessing the efficacy of music interventions in the treatment of hypertension are warranted.
高血压药物治疗的不良反应、治疗抵抗及高成本使得人们对音乐干预等非药物补充疗法的兴趣日益增加。本荟萃分析旨在概述已报道的关于音乐干预治疗高血压疗效的证据。
对1990年1月至2014年6月发表的关于音乐干预对成年高血压患者血压影响的文献进行系统检索。纳入随访时间≥28天的随机对照试验。采用逆方差加权法合并血压测量值。
在检索的1689篇摘要中,纳入了10项随机对照试验。音乐干预组的随机效应合并分析显示,平均收缩压(SBP)有从144 mmHg(95%CI:137 - 152)降至134 mmHg(95%CI:124 - 144)的趋势,平均舒张压(DBP)有从84 mmHg(95%CI:78 - 89)降至78 mmHg(95%CI:73 - 84)的趋势。对3项有有效对照组的试验亚组进行固定效应分析显示,干预组和对照组的合并平均SBP和DBP均显著降低。由于缺乏离散度测量值,无法对音乐干预组和对照组进行比较。
本系统评价和荟萃分析显示,接受音乐干预的高血压患者血压有下降趋势,但未能确立音乐干预与血压降低之间的因果关系。鉴于这种安全、低成本干预的潜在价值,有必要开展设计良好、高质量且有足够效力的随机研究来评估音乐干预治疗高血压的疗效。