Bradt Joke, Dileo Cheryl, Potvin Noah
Department of Creative Arts Therapies, College of Nursing and Health Professions, Drexel University, 1505 Race Street, rm 1041, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 19102.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 28;2013(12):CD006577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006577.pub3.
Individuals with coronary heart disease (CHD) often suffer from severe distress due to diagnosis, hospitalization, surgical procedures, uncertainty of outcome, fear of dying, doubts about progress in recovery, helplessness and loss of control. Such adverse effects put the cardiac patient at greater risk for complications, including sudden cardiac death. It is therefore of crucial importance that the care of people with CHD focuses on psychological as well as physiological needs.Music interventions have been used to reduce anxiety and distress and improve physiological functioning in medical patients; however its efficacy for people with CHD needs to be evaluated.
To update the previously published review that examined the effects of music interventions with standard care versus standard care alone on psychological and physiological responses in persons with CHD.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) on The Cochrane Library (2012, Issue 10), MEDLINE (OvidSP, 1950 to October week 4 2012), EMBASE (OvidSP, 1974 to October week 5 2012), CINAHL (EBSCOhost, 1982 to 9 November 2012), PsycINFO (OvidSP, 1806 to October week 5 2012), LILACS (Virtual Health Library, 1982 to 15 November 2012), Social Science Citation Index (ISI, 1974 to 9 November 2012), a number of other databases, and clinical trial registers. We also conducted handsearching of journals and reference lists. We applied no language restrictions.
We included all randomized controlled trials and quasi-randomized trials that compared music interventions and standard care with standard care alone for persons with confirmed CHD.
Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality, seeking additional information from the trial researchers when necessary. We present results using weighted mean differences for outcomes measured by the same scale, and standardized mean differences for outcomes measured by different scales. We used post-intervention scores. In cases of significant baseline difference, we used change scores (changes from baseline).
We identified four new trials for this update. In total, the evidence for this review rests on 26 trials (1369 participants). Listening to music was the main intervention used, and 23 of the studies did not include a trained music therapist.Results indicate that music interventions have a small beneficial effect on psychological distress in people with CHD and this effect is consistent across studies (MD = -1.26, 95% CI -2.30 to -0.22, P = 0.02, I² = 0%). Listening to music has a moderate effect on anxiety in people with CHD; however results were inconsistent across studies (SMD = -0.70, 95% CI -1.17 to -0.22, P = 0.004, I² = 77%). Studies that used music interventions in people with myocardial infarction found more consistent anxiety-reducing effects of music, with an average anxiety reduction of 5.87 units on a 20 to 80 point score range (95% CI -7.99 to -3.75, P < 0.00001, I² = 53%). Furthermore, studies that used patient-selected music resulted in greater anxiety-reducing effects that were consistent across studies (SMD = -0.89, 95% CI -1.42 to -0.36, P = 0.001, I² = 48%). Findings indicate that listening to music reduces heart rate (MD = -3.40, 95% CI -6.12 to -0.69, P = 0.01), respiratory rate (MD = -2.50, 95% CI -3.61 to -1.39, P < 0.00001) and systolic blood pressure (MD = -5.52 mmHg, 95% CI - 7.43 to -3.60, P < 0.00001). Studies that included two or more music sessions led to a small and consistent pain-reducing effect (SMD = -0.27, 95% CI -0.55 to -0.00, P = 0.05). The results also suggest that listening to music may improve patients' quality of sleep following a cardiac procedure or surgery (SMD = 0.91, 95% CI 0.03 to 1.79, P = 0.04).We found no strong evidence for heart rate variability and depression. Only one study considered hormone levels and quality of life as an outcome variable. A small number of studies pointed to a possible beneficial effect of music on opioid intake after cardiac procedures or surgery, but more research is needed to strengthen this evidence.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review indicates that listening to music may have a beneficial effect on anxiety in persons with CHD, especially those with a myocardial infarction. Anxiety-reducing effects appear to be greatest when people are given a choice of which music to listen to.Furthermore, listening to music may have a beneficial effect on systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, quality of sleep and pain in persons with CHD. However, the clinical significance of these findings is unclear. Since many of the studies are at high risk of bias, these findings need to be interpreted with caution. More research is needed into the effects of music interventions offered by a trained music therapist.
冠心病(CHD)患者常常因诊断、住院、手术、预后不确定、对死亡的恐惧、对康复进程的疑虑、无助感以及失去控制感而遭受严重困扰。这些负面影响使心脏病患者面临更高的并发症风险,包括心源性猝死。因此,对冠心病患者的护理关注心理和生理需求至关重要。音乐干预已被用于减轻医疗患者的焦虑和困扰,并改善其生理功能;然而,其对冠心病患者的疗效尚需评估。
更新之前发表的综述,该综述探讨了音乐干预联合标准护理与单纯标准护理相比,对冠心病患者心理和生理反应的影响。
我们检索了Cochrane图书馆(2012年第10期)中的Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL)、MEDLINE(OvidSP,1950年至2012年10月第4周)、EMBASE(OvidSP,1974年至2012年10月第5周)、CINAHL(EBSCOhost,1982年至2012年11月9日)、PsycINFO(OvidSP,1806年至2012年10月第5周)、LILACS(虚拟健康图书馆,1982年至2012年11月15日)、社会科学引文索引(ISI,1974年至2012年11月9日)以及其他一些数据库和临床试验注册库。我们还对手检期刊和参考文献列表进行了检索。我们未设语言限制。
我们纳入了所有比较音乐干预联合标准护理与单纯标准护理对确诊冠心病患者心理和生理反应影响的随机对照试验和半随机试验。
两位综述作者独立提取数据并评估方法学质量,必要时向试验研究者寻求更多信息。我们使用加权均数差来呈现同一量表测量结果的效应,使用标准化均数差来呈现不同量表测量结果的效应。我们采用干预后的评分。在基线差异显著时,则使用变化评分(相对于基线的变化)。
本次更新我们确定了四项新试验。本综述的证据总共基于26项试验(1369名参与者)。聆听音乐是主要的干预方式,其中23项研究未纳入经过培训的音乐治疗师。结果表明,音乐干预对冠心病患者的心理困扰有较小的有益影响,且这种影响在各研究中具有一致性(MD = -1.26,95%CI -2.30至-0.22,P = 0.02,I² = 0%)。聆听音乐对冠心病患者的焦虑有中等程度的影响;然而,各研究结果不一致(SMD = -0.70,95%CI -1.