• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种焊料标记材料的尺寸稳定性。

Dimensional stability of two solder index materials.

作者信息

Khaledi Amir Ali Reza, Pardis Soheil, Pourhatami Negar, Ardakani Zahra Hashemi

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Biomaterial Research Center, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.

出版信息

Eur J Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):259-263. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.178295.

DOI:10.4103/1305-7456.178295
PMID:27095908
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4813447/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the dimensional accuracy of two indexing materials, an acrylic resin (GC pattern resin) and a castable composite (Bredent). The effect of time lapse until investment was also investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two standardized brass dies 15 mm apart were prepared and then 20 identical coping-bar assemblies were designed and fabricated by a rapid prototyping device. Each bar was sectioned at the center, and indices were fabricated from an acrylic resin or castable composite (n = 10 per group). The distances between the reference points were measured with a digital microscope at ×80 magnifications at 15 min, 60 min, and 24 h after indexing. Data were statically analyzed using repeated-measure ANOVA (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

The distance between the reference points without the coping being joined was considered as the baseline measurement (control group). The mean distance was 19.30 ± 0.04 mm between the reference points where the copings were not joined. When indexed with acrylic resin, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) dimensions were 19.27 ± 0.087 mm (15 min), 19.25 ± 0.09 mm (60 min), and 18.98 ± 0.1 mm (24 h). The mean ± SD dimensions for composite were 19.29 ± 0.087 mm (15 min), 19.28 ± 0.08 mm (60 min), and 19.26 ± 0.08 mm (24 h). All tested groups showed significant differences compared to the control group except when it was indexed with composite and where the distances were measured after 15 and 60 min (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The most accurate indexed-assemblies belonged to castable composite at 15 and 60 min.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较两种分度材料(一种丙烯酸树脂(GC 型树脂)和一种可铸型复合材料(Bredent))的尺寸精度。同时还研究了直至包埋前的时间间隔的影响。

材料与方法

制备两个相距 15 mm 的标准化黄铜模具,然后通过快速成型设备设计并制造 20 个相同的冠桩组件。每个杆在中心处截断,并用丙烯酸树脂或可铸型复合材料制作分度器(每组 n = 10)。在分度后 15 分钟、60 分钟和 24 小时,使用数码显微镜在 80 倍放大倍数下测量参考点之间的距离。数据采用重复测量方差分析进行统计学分析(α = 0.05)。

结果

未连接冠时参考点之间的距离被视为基线测量值(对照组)。未连接冠时参考点之间的平均距离为 19.30 ± 0.04 mm。用丙烯酸树脂分度时,平均 ± 标准差(SD)尺寸为 19.27 ± 0.087 mm(15 分钟)、19.25 ± 0.09 mm(60 分钟)和 18.98 ± 0.1 mm(24 小时)。复合材料的平均 ± SD 尺寸为 19.29 ± 0.087 mm(15 分钟)、19.28 ± 0.08 mm(60 分钟)和 19.26 ± 0.08 mm(24 小时)。所有测试组与对照组相比均显示出显著差异,但用复合材料分度且在 15 分钟和 60 分钟后测量距离时除外(P > 0.05)。

结论

在 15 分钟和 60 分钟时,尺寸精度最高的分度组件属于可铸型复合材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d013/4813447/6ebbe38363ca/EJD-10-259-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d013/4813447/6ebbe38363ca/EJD-10-259-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d013/4813447/6ebbe38363ca/EJD-10-259-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Dimensional stability of two solder index materials.两种焊料标记材料的尺寸稳定性。
Eur J Dent. 2016 Apr-Jun;10(2):259-263. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.178295.
2
A comparison of two solder registration materials: a three-dimensional analysis.两种焊料定位材料的比较:三维分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 May;95(5):379-91. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.013.
3
The effect of time lapse on the accuracy of two acrylic resins used to assemble an implant framework for soldering.时间间隔对用于组装用于焊接的种植体框架的两种丙烯酸树脂准确性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Jun;91(6):538-40. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(02)52728-1.
4
Effect of layering gingiva-shade composite resin on the strength of denture base polymers.分层牙龈色复合树脂对义齿基托聚合物强度的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2019 Aug;122(2):153.e1-153.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
5
An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses.多内部连接种植体修复体印模技术的评估
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Nov;92(5):470-6. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.08.015.
6
Verification jig for implant-supported prostheses: A comparison of standard impressions with verification jigs made of different materials.种植体支持式修复体的验证夹具:标准印模与不同材料制成的验证夹具的比较。
J Prosthet Dent. 2002 Sep;88(3):329-36. doi: 10.1067/mpr.2002.128070.
7
Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.评价直接和间接数字化扫描程序制作的氧化锆全瓷冠适合性。
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug;120(2):225-231. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.08.003. Epub 2018 Feb 7.
8
Marginal Discrepancy of Single Implant-Supported Metal Copings Fabricated by Various CAD/CAM and Conventional Techniques Using Different Materials.采用不同材料通过各种CAD/CAM及传统技术制作的单颗种植体支持式金属基底冠的边缘差异
Eur J Dent. 2019 Oct;13(4):563-568. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700364. Epub 2019 Nov 26.
9
A Clinical Comparative Study of 3-Dimensional Accuracy between Digital and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques.数字化与传统种植体印模技术三维精度的临床对比研究。
J Prosthodont. 2019 Apr;28(4):e902-e908. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12764. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
10
A comparative analysis of the accuracy of different direct impression techniques for multiple implants.不同多颗种植体直接印模技术准确性的比较分析。
Aust Dent J. 2012 Jun;57(2):184-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2012.01685.x. Epub 2012 Apr 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the marginal fit of full ceramic crowns by the microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) technique.采用微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)技术评估全瓷冠的边缘适合性。
Eur J Dent. 2014 Oct;8(4):437-444. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.143612.
2
Comparative assessment of marginal accuracy of grade II titanium and Ni-Cr alloy before and after ceramic firing: An in vitro study.II级钛合金和镍铬合金烤瓷前后边缘适合性的比较评估:一项体外研究。
Eur J Dent. 2013 Jul;7(3):272-277. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.115409.
3
A comparison of two solder registration materials: a three-dimensional analysis.
两种焊料定位材料的比较:三维分析
J Prosthet Dent. 2006 May;95(5):379-91. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2006.02.013.
4
The effect of time lapse on the accuracy of two acrylic resins used to assemble an implant framework for soldering.时间间隔对用于组装用于焊接的种植体框架的两种丙烯酸树脂准确性的影响。
J Prosthet Dent. 2004 Jun;91(6):538-40. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(02)52728-1.
5
Photogrammetry--an alternative to conventional impressions in implant dentistry? A clinical pilot study.摄影测量法——种植牙科传统印模的替代方法?一项临床初步研究。
Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Jul-Aug;12(4):363-8.
6
Strategies to achieve fit in implant prosthodontics: a review of the literature.
Int J Prosthodont. 1999 Mar-Apr;12(2):167-78.
7
Fit of implant frameworks fabricated by different techniques.
J Prosthet Dent. 1997 Dec;78(6):596-604. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(97)70011-8.
8
Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface.测量种植义齿修复界面的适合度。
J Prosthet Dent. 1996 Mar;75(3):314-25. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(96)90491-6.
9
Three-dimensional analysis of the casting accuracy of one-piece, osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses.一体式骨结合种植体支持修复体铸造精度的三维分析
Int J Prosthodont. 1993 Jul-Aug;6(4):346-63.
10
Efficient soldering index materials for fixed partial dentures and implant substructures.用于固定局部义齿和种植体下部结构的高效焊接指示材料。
J Prosthet Dent. 1995 May;73(5):424-7. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3913(05)80069-1.