Levine Zachary H, Cockayne Eric
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
J Res Natl Inst Stand Technol. 2008 Oct 1;113(5):299-304. doi: 10.6028/jres.113.023. Print 2008 Sep-Oct.
In linear response theory, the dielectric response at zero frequency sometimes appears to violate the f-sum rule, which has apparent implications for causality. Here, we study the origin of this apparent discrepancy, focusing on Lindhard's formula for the transverse response of the electron gas. At non-zero frequency, first-order poles contribute to the imaginary part of the dielectric function in the usual way. At zero frequency, second-order poles contribute in a way which forces a careful consideration of the notation of summation and integration to avoid an error. A compact formula for the contribution of the second-order poles is presented. The sense in which the f-sum rule is satisfied is discussed.
在线性响应理论中,零频率下的介电响应有时似乎违反了f和规则,这对因果关系有着明显的影响。在此,我们研究这种明显差异的起源,重点关注电子气横向响应的林哈德公式。在非零频率下,一阶极点以通常的方式对介电函数的虚部有贡献。在零频率下,二阶极点的贡献方式要求仔细考虑求和与积分的记号,以避免出错。给出了二阶极点贡献的一个简洁公式。讨论了满足f和规则的意义。