Stojkovic Ivan, Ghalwash Mohamed, Cao Xi Hang, Obradovic Zoran
Center for Data Analytics and Biomedical Informatics, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, 19122, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Signals and Systems Department, School of Electrical Engineering, University of Belgrade, 11120, Belgrade, Serbia.
Sci Rep. 2016 Apr 21;6:24719. doi: 10.1038/srep24719.
Sepsis is a serious, life-threatening condition that presents a growing problem in medicine, but there is still no satisfying solution for treating it. Several blood cleansing approaches recently gained attention as promising interventions that target the main site of problem development-the blood. The focus of this study is an evaluation of the theoretical effectiveness of hemoadsorption therapy and pathogen reduction therapy. This is evaluated using the mathematical model of Murine sepsis, and the results of over 2,200 configurations of single and multiple intervention therapies simulated on 5,000 virtual subjects suggest the advantage of pathogen reduction over hemoadsorption therapy. However, a combination of two approaches is found to take advantage of their complementary effects and outperform either therapy alone. The conducted computational experiments provide unprecedented evidence that the combination of two therapies synergistically enhances the positive effects beyond the simple superposition of the benefits of two approaches. Such a characteristic could have a profound influence on the way sepsis treatment is conducted.
脓毒症是一种严重的、危及生命的病症,在医学领域中是一个日益严峻的问题,但目前仍没有令人满意的治疗方法。最近,几种血液净化方法作为针对问题发展的主要部位——血液——的有前景的干预措施而受到关注。本研究的重点是评估血液吸附疗法和病原体灭活疗法的理论有效性。这是通过小鼠脓毒症的数学模型进行评估的,在5000名虚拟受试者上模拟的2200多种单干预和多干预疗法配置的结果表明,病原体灭活疗法优于血液吸附疗法。然而,发现两种方法的组合利用了它们的互补作用,并且比单独的任何一种疗法都更有效。所进行的计算实验提供了前所未有的证据,即两种疗法的组合协同增强了积极效果,超越了两种方法益处的简单叠加。这种特性可能会对脓毒症的治疗方式产生深远影响。