Stanford Genome Technology Center, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 26;110(9):3507-12. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1222878110. Epub 2013 Feb 11.
A cornerstone of modern biomedical research is the use of mouse models to explore basic pathophysiological mechanisms, evaluate new therapeutic approaches, and make go or no-go decisions to carry new drug candidates forward into clinical trials. Systematic studies evaluating how well murine models mimic human inflammatory diseases are nonexistent. Here, we show that, although acute inflammatory stresses from different etiologies result in highly similar genomic responses in humans, the responses in corresponding mouse models correlate poorly with the human conditions and also, one another. Among genes changed significantly in humans, the murine orthologs are close to random in matching their human counterparts (e.g., R(2) between 0.0 and 0.1). In addition to improvements in the current animal model systems, our study supports higher priority for translational medical research to focus on the more complex human conditions rather than relying on mouse models to study human inflammatory diseases.
现代生物医学研究的基石之一是使用小鼠模型来探索基本的病理生理机制,评估新的治疗方法,并做出前进或停止的决策,将新的候选药物推进临床试验。目前还没有系统地研究评估小鼠模型在多大程度上模拟人类炎症性疾病。在这里,我们表明,尽管不同病因引起的急性炎症应激在人类中导致高度相似的基因组反应,但相应的小鼠模型与人类疾病的相关性以及彼此之间的相关性较差。在人类中显著变化的基因中,与人类对应的小鼠同源物几乎随机匹配(例如,R(2) 在 0.0 到 0.1 之间)。除了改进当前的动物模型系统外,我们的研究还支持将转化医学研究的重点放在更复杂的人类疾病上,而不是依赖小鼠模型来研究人类炎症性疾病。