Meeker-O'Connell Ann, Glessner Coleen, Behm Mark, Mulinde Jean, Roach Nancy, Sweeney Fergus, Tenaerts Pamela, Landray Martin J
Johnson & Johnson, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Alexion, New Haven, CT, USA.
Clin Trials. 2016 Aug;13(4):439-44. doi: 10.1177/1740774516643491. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
Stakeholders across the clinical trial enterprise have expressed concern that the current clinical trial enterprise is unsustainable. The cost and complexity of trials have continued to increase, threatening our ability to generate reliable evidence essential for making appropriate decisions concerning the benefits and harms associated with clinical interventions. Overcoming this inefficiency rests on improving protocol design, trial planning, and quality oversight.
The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative convened a project to evaluate methods to prospectively build quality into the scientific and operational design of clinical trials ("quality-by-design"), such that trials are feasible to conduct and important errors are prevented rather than remediated. A working group evaluated aspects of trial design and oversight and developed the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative quality-by-design principles document, outlining a series of factors generally relevant to the reliability of trial conclusions and to patient safety. These principles were then applied and further refined during a series of hands-on workshops to evaluate their utility in facilitating proactive, cross-functional dialogue, and decision-making about trial design and planning. Following these workshops, independent qualitative interviews were conducted with 19 workshop attendees to explore the potential challenges for implementing a quality-by-design approach to clinical trials. The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative project team subsequently developed recommendations and an online resource guide to support implementation of this approach.
The Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative quality-by-design principles provide a framework for assuring that clinical trials adequately safeguard participants and provide reliable information on which to make decisions on the effects of treatments. The quality-by-design workshops highlighted the value of active discussions incorporating the different perspectives within and external to an organization (e.g. clinical investigators, research site staff, and trial participants) in improving trial design. Workshop participants also recognized the value of focusing oversight on those aspects of the trial where errors would have a major impact on participant safety and reliability of results. Applying the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative quality-by-design recommendations and principles should enable organizations to prioritize the most critical determinants of a trial's quality, identify non-essential activities that can be eliminated to streamline trial conduct and oversight, and formulate appropriate plans to define, avoid, mitigate, monitor, and address important errors.
整个临床试验领域的利益相关者都对当前临床试验领域不可持续表示担忧。试验的成本和复杂性持续增加,这威胁到我们生成可靠证据的能力,而这些证据对于就临床干预措施的益处和危害做出恰当决策至关重要。克服这种低效率依赖于改进方案设计、试验规划和质量监督。
临床试验转型倡议组织开展了一个项目,以评估将质量前瞻性地融入临床试验的科学和操作设计(“设计质量”)的方法,使试验可行并预防而非纠正重大错误。一个工作组评估了试验设计和监督的各个方面,并制定了临床试验转型倡议组织的设计质量原则文件,概述了一系列通常与试验结论的可靠性和患者安全相关的因素。然后在一系列实践研讨会上应用并进一步完善这些原则,以评估它们在促进关于试验设计和规划的积极、跨职能对话及决策方面的效用。在这些研讨会之后,对19名研讨会参与者进行了独立的定性访谈,以探讨实施临床试验设计质量方法的潜在挑战。临床试验转型倡议组织的项目团队随后制定了建议和在线资源指南,以支持这种方法的实施。
临床试验转型倡议组织的设计质量原则提供了一个框架,以确保临床试验充分保护参与者,并提供可靠信息,以便就治疗效果做出决策。设计质量研讨会凸显了纳入组织内部和外部不同观点(如临床研究人员、研究站点工作人员和试验参与者)的积极讨论在改进试验设计方面的价值。研讨会参与者还认识到将监督重点放在试验中错误会对参与者安全和结果可靠性产生重大影响的那些方面的价值。应用临床试验转型倡议组织的设计质量建议和原则应能使各组织确定试验质量的最关键决定因素的优先级,识别可消除的非必要活动以简化试验实施和监督,并制定适当计划来定义、避免、减轻、监测和处理重大错误。